Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29228840›Full record

ReviewExpert opinion on investigational drugs2018

Investigational PD-1 inhibitors in HL and NHL and biomarkers for predictors of response and outcome.

Andres Chang, Danielle Schlafer, Christopher R Flowers, Pamela B Allen

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Expert opinion on investigational drugs, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 79% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Andres Changa Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology , Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University School of Medicine , Atlanta , GA , USA.
Danielle Schlaferc Department of Pharmaceutical Services , Emory Healthcare , Atlanta , GA , USA.
Christopher R Flowersa Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology , Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University School of Medicine , Atlanta , GA , USA.
Pamela B Allena Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology , Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University School of Medicine , Atlanta , GA , USA.
Emory University · USEmory Healthcare · US

Funding

Translational Physician-Scientist Training Program in OncologyT32CA160040 · NCI · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI SHIN, DONG M · 2013 to 2017
$1.2M
NCI NIH HHS T32 CA160040
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionInhibitors against the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway are revolutionizing the treatment and management of malignancies. AREAS COVERED: We summarize our current understanding of the function of PD-1, its role in immune evasion, the clinical data available that support the use of PD-1 antagonist in Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin lymphomas, and potential predictors of response. EXPERT OPINION: We anticipate that in the next 10 years, agents that modulate the immune system such as PD-1 antagonists will be increasingly used in favor over traditional cytotoxic chemotherapeutic agents. PD-1 antagonists will be combined with future immunotherapies or used as adjuncts to cellular therapy to boost tumor-specific immune responses.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsBiomarkers, TumorDrug DesignDrugs, InvestigationalHodgkin DiseaseHumansLymphoma, Non-HodgkinProgrammed Cell Death 1 ReceptorTreatment OutcomeAntineoplastic AgentsBiomarkers, TumorDrugs, InvestigationalPDCD1 protein, humanProgrammed Cell Death 1 ReceptorHodgkin lymphomaimmunotherapynon-Hodgkin lymphomaPD-1PD-1 inhibitorPD-L1

Identifiers

PMID29228840
PMCPMC5762391
OpenAlexW2773044408

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.