Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29228750›Full record

ArticleOncotarget2017

Dietary fat intake and risk of esophageal carcinoma: a meta-analysis of observational studies.

Du He, Xue Huang, Zai-Ping Wang, Dian Chen, Jun Chen, Chun-Yan Duan

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncotarget, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Dietary Pattern and Cancer.Cancer treatment and research · 2024
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Du He *Department of Oncology, The Central Hospital of Enshi Autonomous Prefecture, Enshi 445000, China.
Xue Huang *Department of Oncology, The Central Hospital of Enshi Autonomous Prefecture, Enshi 445000, China.
Zai-Ping Wang *Department of Oncology, The Central Hospital of Enshi Autonomous Prefecture, Enshi 445000, China.
Dian ChenDepartment of Oncology, The Central Hospital of Enshi Autonomous Prefecture, Enshi 445000, China.
Jun ChenDepartment of Oncology, The Central Hospital of Enshi Autonomous Prefecture, Enshi 445000, China.
Chun-Yan DuanDepartment of Oncology, The Central Hospital of Enshi Autonomous Prefecture, Enshi 445000, China.
The Central Hospital of Enshi Tujia and Miao Autonomous Prefecture · CNWuhan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dietary fat intake is potentially associated with the onset of esophageal carcinoma (EC), but evidence from observational studies has remained unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the role of fat intake in the development of esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) and esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). A systematic search was conducted in PubMed and Web of Science to identify all relevant studies. Study-specific relative risks (RR) for the highest versus the lowest intake categories and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were pooled using a random-effects model. Seventeen case-control studies (2058 EAC cases, 1581 ESCC cases and 11696 controls) and two prospective cohort studies (494, 978 participants and 630 EAC cases and 215 ESCC cases) were identified. In EAC, the RRs (95% CI) were 1.69 (1.14-2.50) for total fat intake, 1.88 (1.28-2.77) for saturated fat (SFA) intake, 1.04 (0.86-1.27) for polyunsaturated fat (PUFA) intake and 1.70 (1.01-2.84) for monounsaturated fat (MUFA) intake. In ESCC, the RRs (95% CI) were 1.12 (0.84-1.51) for total fat, 1.38 (0.91-2.08) for SFA, 0.95 (0.55-1.62) for PUFA and 1.04 (0.65-1.66) for MUFA. In conclusion, total fat, SFA and MUFA intake were associated with EAC risk, but fat intake showed no significant association with ESCC risk. Large-scale prospective cohort studies are needed to confirm our findings.

Indexed as

esophageal carcinomafat intakemeta-analysisrisk

Identifiers

PMID29228750
PMCPMC5716790
OpenAlexW2762187333

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.