Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29228742›Full record

ArticleOncotarget2017

Pretreatment nutritional risk scores and performance status are prognostic factors in esophageal cancer patients treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy.

Tao Song, Qiuyan Wan, Wenke Yu, Jianbo Li, Shaohua Lu, Chen Xie, Hongqing Wang, Min Fang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncotarget, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Modernizing Clinical Trial Eligibility Criteria: Recommendations of the ASCO-Friends of Cancer Research Performance Status Work Group.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2021
    Review
  12. We report performance status in oncology-but not nutritional status?Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Tao SongDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, People's Hospital of Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou 310000, Zhejiang, P.R. China.
Qiuyan WanDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, Jiangxi Cancer Hospital, Nanchang 330029, Jiangxi, P.R. China.
Wenke YuDepartment of Radiology, Zhejiang Qingchun Hospital, Medical College of Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310000, Zhejiang, P.R. China.
Jianbo LiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Ningbo Mingzhou Hospital, Ningbo 315000, Zhejiang, P.R. China.
Shaohua LuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Jinhua Guangfu Hospital, Jinhua 321000, Zhejiang, P.R. China.
Chen XieDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Jiangxi Cancer Hospital, Nanchang 330029, Jiangxi, P.R. China.
Hongqing WangDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou 325000, Zhejiang, P.R. China.
Min FangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, People's Hospital of Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou 310000, Zhejiang, P.R. China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study evaluated the prognostic effects of nutritional risk scores and performance status (PS) on unresectable locally advanced esophageal cancer (LAEC) patients who were treated with definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy (dCRT). A total of 202 LAEC patients from four different cancer centers were retrospectively reviewed. Nutritional risk and PS were measured using the Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 (NRS-2002) scores and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) scales. Outcomes were clinical response rate, overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Multivariate analysis of predictive factors of response to dCRT and survival were performed using a logistic regression and a Cox model, respectively. The majority of patients (71.8%) had an ECOG PS score of 0-1, and 52.5% (n=106) of patients were identified as having nutritional risk (NRS-2002 ≥3) upon treatment initiation. There was no correlation between NRS-2002 scores and ECOG PS (Spearman's ρ=0.046;

Indexed as

ECOG PSesophageal cancerNRS-2002survivaltreatment response

Identifiers

PMID29228742
PMCPMC5716782

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.