Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29228718›Full record

ArticleOncotarget2017

Increased single-strand annealing rather than non-homologous end-joining predicts hereditary ovarian carcinoma.

Miriam Deniz, Tatiana Romashova, Sarah Kostezka, Anke Faul, Theresa Gundelach, Maria Moreno-Villanueva, Wolfgang Janni, Thomas W P Friedl, Lisa Wiesmüller

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncotarget, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Single-Strand Annealing in Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Miriam DenizDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.
Tatiana RomashovaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.
Sarah KostezkaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.
Anke FaulDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.
Theresa GundelachDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.
Maria Moreno-VillanuevaDepartment of Biology, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany.
Wolfgang JanniDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.
Thomas W P FriedlDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.
Lisa WiesmüllerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mutations in genes encoding DNA double-strand break (DSB) repair components, especially homologous recombination (HR) proteins, were found to predispose to breast and ovarian cancer. Beyond high penetrance risk gene mutations underlying monogenic defects, low risk gene mutations generate polygenic defects, enlarging the fraction of individuals with a predisposing phenotype. DSB repair dysfunction opens new options for targeted therapies; poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors have been approved for BRCA-mutated and platinum-responsive ovarian cancers. In this work, we performed functional analyses in peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBLs) using a case-control design. We examined 38 women with familial history of breast and/or ovarian cancer, 40 women with primary ovarian cancer and 34 healthy controls. Using a GFP-based test we analyzed error-prone DSB repair mechanisms which are known to compensate for HR defects and to generate chromosomal instabilities. While non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ) did not discriminate between cases and controls, we found increases of single-strand annealing (SSA) in women with familial risk vs. controls (P=0.016) and patients with ovarian cancer vs. controls (P=0.002). Consistent with compromised HR we also detected increased sensitivities to carboplatin in PBLs from high-risk individuals (P<0.0001) as well as patients (P=0.0011) compared to controls. Conversely, neither PARP inhibitor responses nor PARP activities were altered in PBLs from the case groups, but PARP activities increased with age in high-risk individuals, providing novel clues for differential drug mode-of-action. Our findings indicate the great potential of detecting SSA activities to deliver an estimate of ovarian cancer susceptibility and therapeutic responsiveness beyond the limitations of genotyping.

Indexed as

early-onset ovarian cancererror-prone DNA repairfunctional biomarkerovarian cancer riskPARP activity

Identifiers

PMID29228718
PMCPMC5716758

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.