Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29228622›Full record

ArticleOncotarget2017

Comparison between liver resection and liver transplantation on outcomes in patients with solitary hepatocellular carcinoma meeting UNOS criteria: a population-based study of the SEER database.

Anli Yang, Weiqiang Ju, Xiaopeng Yuan, Ming Han, Xiaoping Wang, Zhiyong Guo, Xiaoli Wei, Dongping Wang, Xiaofeng Zhu, Linwei Wu and 1 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncotarget, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Patient Selection for Downstaging of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Prior to Liver Transplantation-Adjusting the Odds?Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2022
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Anli YangOrgan Transplant Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China.
Weiqiang JuOrgan Transplant Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China.
Xiaopeng YuanOrgan Transplant Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China.
Ming HanOrgan Transplant Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China.
Xiaoping WangOrgan Transplant Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China.
Zhiyong GuoOrgan Transplant Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China.
Xiaoli WeiDepartment of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou 510060, China.
Dongping WangOrgan Transplant Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China.
Xiaofeng ZhuOrgan Transplant Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China.
Linwei WuOrgan Transplant Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China.
Xiaoshun HeOrgan Transplant Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China.
The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University · CNSun Yat-sen University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Liver resection (LR) and liver transplantation (LT) are potential curative treatment methods for early hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, it is controversial which treatment is more beneficial to patients with solitary HCC meeting the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) criteria (single lesion, diameter≤50mm, no vascular invasion, no extrahepatic metastasis). We retrieved patients with solitary HCC meeting UNOS criteria diagnosed between 2004-2013 from the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to evaluate the impact of surgery type (LR/LT) on overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) in both the whole study group and subgroups. Our analyses show that LT Patients had significantly superior OS (Adjusted

Indexed as

hepatocellular carcinomaliver resectionliver transplantationUNOS criteria

Identifiers

PMID29228622
PMCPMC5722574
OpenAlexW2766736153

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.