ArticleOncotarget2017
Age-specific impact on the survival of gastric cancer patients with distant metastasis: an analysis of SEER database.
Article in Oncotarget, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Longitudinal trajectories of nutritional markers in patients with de novo Stage IV gastric cancer: a descriptive analysis using one-year survival as a reference.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026Article
- Impact of anesthesia methods on adverse cardiovascular events during painless gastroscopy in frail older patients: study protocol for a prospective controlled trial.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Age-Related Differences in Gastric Adenocarcinoma from 2000-2020: A SEER Database Analysis.Journal of gastrointestinal cancer · 2025Article
- Clinical presentation and treatment outcomes of gastric adenocarcinoma patients: a retrospective study from Ain Shams Clinical Oncology Department.Ecancermedicalscience · 2025Article
- Effect of Age at Diagnosis on the Prognosis of Gastric Cancer Patients: A Population-Based Study in Georgia.Cureus · 2024Article
- Machine learning to predict distant metastasis and prognostic analysis of moderately differentiated gastric adenocarcinoma patients: a novel focus on lymph node indicators.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Article
- Metastasis patterns and prognosis in young gastric cancer patients: A propensity score‑matched SEER database analysis.PloS one · 2024Article
- Application of machine learning algorithms to predict lymph node metastasis in gastric neuroendocrine neoplasms.Heliyon · 2023Article
- Predictors of survival outcomes among patients with gastric cancer in a leading tertiary, teaching and referral hospital in Kenya.Cancer medicine · 2023Article
- Development of an alarm symptom-based risk prediction score for localized oesophagogastric adenocarcinoma (VIOLA score).ESMO open · 2022Article
- Prognostic significance of sarcopenia in microsatellite-stable gastric cancer patients treated with programmed death-1 inhibitors.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2021Article
- The impact of age on prognosis in patients with gastric cancer: experience in a tertiary care centre.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2020Article
- Prognostic role of body composition parameters in gastric/gastroesophageal junction cancer patients from the EXPAND trial.Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The age-specific impact on the survival of gastric cancer patients with distant metastasis is still unclear. In this study, we identified 11, 299 gastric cancer patients with distant metastasis between 2004 and 2013 from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results population-based dataset. Patients were divided into young (≤60) and elderly groups (>60). Kaplan-Meier methods and multivariable Cox regression were used for the analysis of long-term survival outcomes and risk factors. There were significant differences between the two groups in terms of race, primary site, grade, histologic type, surgery, marital status and clinical T stage (P<0.05). The 1- and 3-year cancer specific survival rates were 29.0% and 6.2% in young group and 22.8% and 4.8% in elderly group in both univariate (X
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.