ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2018
Most m6A RNA Modifications in Protein-Coding Regions Are Evolutionarily Unconserved and Likely Nonfunctional.
Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
46 citing papers in PubMed, 65 citations in OpenAlex.
- A DRACH Observed/Expected Metric Reveals the Evolutionary Landscape of Epitranscriptomic Regulation Across Bilateria.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2026Article
- Direct and indirect regulation of fetal globin transcript by the RNA-binding protein IGF2BP1.Blood · 2026Article
- High-stoichiometry mRNA (New York, N.Y.) · 2026Article
- Different mRNAs encoding identical proteins: how and why?Journal of applied genetics · 2026Article
- Comparative analysis of m6A mRNA modification inFrontiers in genetics · 2026Article
- Characterization of mEuropean journal of medical research · 2025Article
- Direct and indirect regulation of fetal globin transcript by RNA-binding protein IGF2BP1.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Emerging Orchestrator of Ecological Adaptation: mMolecular ecology · 2025Review
- m6A modification is incorporated into bacterial mRNA without specific functional benefit.Nucleic acids research · 2025Article
- Most m5C Modifications in Mammalian mRNAs are Nonadaptive.Molecular biology and evolution · 2025Article
- On the reversibility of RNA deamination versus RNA methylation: exploring the proximate and ultimate causes.Journal of genetics · 2025Review
- Comparative genomic analyses on assassin bugiScience · 2024Article
- GTDrift: a resource for exploring the interplay between genetic drift, genomic and transcriptomic characteristics in eukaryotes.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2024Article
- Article
- Dissecting the sequence and structural determinants guiding m6A deposition and evolution via inter- and intra-species hybrids.Genome biology · 2024Article
- Genes for highly abundant proteins in Escherichia coli avoid 5' codons that promote ribosomal initiation.PLoS computational biology · 2023Article
- Gene product diversity: adaptive or not?Trends in genetics : TIG · 2022Review
- N6-methyladenosine-related single-nucleotide polymorphism analyses identify oncogene RNFT2 in bladder cancer.Cancer cell international · 2022Article
- Emerging roles of the RNA modifications N6-methyladenosine and adenosine-to-inosine in cardiovascular diseases.Molecular therapy. Nucleic acids · 2022Review
- Role of Epitranscriptomic and Epigenetic Modifications during the Lytic and Latent Phases of Herpesvirus Infections.Microorganisms · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Methylation of the adenosine base at the nitrogen-6 position (m6A) is the most prevalent internal posttranscriptional modification of mRNAs in many eukaryotes. Despite the rapid progress in the transcriptome-wide mapping of m6As, identification of proteins responsible for writing, reading, and erasing m6As, and elucidation of m6A functions in splicing, RNA stability, translation, and other processes, it is unknown whether most observed m6A modifications are functional. To address this question, we respectively analyze the evolutionary conservation of yeast and human m6As in protein-coding regions. Relative to comparable unmethylated As, m6As are overall no more conserved in yeasts and only slightly more conserved in mammals. Furthermore, yeast m6As and comparable unmethylated As have no significant difference in single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) density or SNP site frequency spectrum. The same is true in human. The methylation status of a gene, not necessarily the specific sites methylated in the gene, is subject to purifying selection for no more than ∼20% of m6A-modified genes. These observations suggest that most m6A modifications in protein-coding regions are nonfunctional and nonadaptive, probably resulting from off-target activities of m6A methyltransferases. In addition, our reanalysis invalidates the recent claim of positive selection for newly acquired m6A modifications in human evolution. Regarding the small number of evolutionarily conserved m6As, evidence suggests that a large proportion of them are likely functional; they should be prioritized in future functional characterizations of m6As. Together, these findings have important implications for understanding the biological significance of m6A and other posttranscriptional modifications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.