Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29228247›Full record

Trial reportPain medicine (Malden, Mass.)2018

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo- and Active Comparator-Controlled Phase I Study of Analgesic/Antihyperalgesic Properties of ASP8477, a Fatty Acid Amide Hydrolase Inhibitor, in Healthy Female Subjects.

Klaus Schaffler, Ashraf Yassen, Peter Reeh, Paul Passier

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Pain medicine (Malden, Mass.), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Lipid-metabolizing serine hydrolases in the mammalian central nervous system: endocannabinoids and beyond.Biochimica et biophysica acta. Molecular and cell biology of lipids · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Klaus SchafflerHuman Pharmacodynamic Research (HPR) Dr. Schaffler GmbH, Munich, Germany.
Ashraf YassenAstellas Pharma Europe B.V., Leiden, Netherlands.
Peter ReehInstitute for Physiology and Pathophysiology, University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany.
Paul PassierAstellas Pharma Europe B.V., Leiden, Netherlands.
Astellas Pharma (Netherlands) · NLFriedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the analgesic/antihyperalgesic effect of ASP8477. Design: Randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, cross-over, placebo- and active comparator-controlled study. Setting: HPR Dr. Schaffler GmbH, Munich, Germany. Subjects: Healthy female subjects aged 18-65 years. Methods: Eligible subjects were randomly assigned to one of six treatment sequences and received multiple ascending doses of ASP8477, duloxetine, and placebo over three treatment periods (each consisting of 21-day dosing separated by 14-day washout periods). On the last day of each dose level, laser evoked potentials (LEPs) and visual analog scales (VAS pain) on capsaicin-treated skin at baseline and at multiple postdose time points were assessed. The primary end point was the difference in LEP N2-P2 peak-to-peak (PtP) amplitudes for ASP8477 100 mg vs placebo. Results: Twenty-five subjects were randomized. In all subjects, LEP N2-P2 PtP amplitudes were numerically lower for ASP8477 100 mg vs placebo (P = 0.0721); in subjects who demonstrated positive capsaicin skin effects, a greater mean difference of -2.24 µV (P = 0.0146) was observed. Across all doses, LEP N2-P2 PtP amplitudes were lower for duloxetine compared with ASP8477 (mean difference -3.80 µV; P < 0.0001) or placebo (mean difference -5.21 µV; P < 0.0001). The effect of ASP8477 (all doses) on down-scoring the VAS pain score was significant compared with placebo (mean difference -2.55%; P < 0.0007). Conclusions: ASP8477 was well tolerated in this study. Analysis of all subjects did not demonstrate a significant difference in LEP for ASP8477 100 mg over placebo but did in subjects who demonstrated positive capsaicin skin effects.

Indexed as

Pain ManagementAdultAmidohydrolasesAnalgesicsCross-Over StudiesDose-Response Relationship, DrugDouble-Blind MethodFatty Acid Amide HydrolasesFemaleHealthy VolunteersHumansPain MeasurementPiperidinesPyridinesAmidohydrolasesAnalgesicsASP8477Fatty Acid Amide HydrolasesPiperidinesPyridines

Identifiers

PMID29228247
PMCPMC5998989
OpenAlexW2774921007

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.