Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29228179›Full record

ArticleGenome biology and evolution2018

A Large Panel of Drosophila simulans Reveals an Abundance of Common Variants.

Sarah A Signor, Felicia N New, Sergey Nuzhdin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Methylation-associated mutagenesis underlies variation in the mutation spectrum across eukaryotes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  6. Rapid evolution and comparative analysis of piRNA clusters inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  7. The ongoing invasion of the endogenous retrovirusbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sarah A SignorDepartment of Molecular and Computational Biology, University of Southern California.
Felicia N NewDepartment of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology, University of Florida College of Medicine.
Sergey NuzhdinDepartment of Molecular and Computational Biology, University of Southern California.

Funding

Population Genetic Framework for Neuroanatomical Mechanisms of Behavioral ModificR01MH091561 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI NUZHDIN, SERGEY V · 2011 to 2014
$1.6M
Quantitative Comparisons between genotypes and model speciesR01GM102227 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI MCINTYRE, LAUREN M. · 2012 to 2015
$1.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM102227NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH091561
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rapidly expanding availability of large NGS data sets provides an opportunity to investigate population genetics at an unprecedented scale. Drosophila simulans is the sister species of the model organism Drosophila melanogaster, and is often presumed to share similar demographic history. However, previous population genetic and ecological work suggests very different signatures of selection and demography. Here, we sequence a new panel of 170 inbred genotypes of a North American population of D. simulans, a valuable complement to the DGRP and other D. melanogaster panels. We find some unexpected signatures of demography, in the form of excess intermediate frequency polymorphisms. Simulations suggest that this is possibly due to a recent population contraction and selection. We examine the outliers in the D. simulans genome determined by a haplotype test to attempt to parse the contribution of demography and selection to the patterns observed in this population. Untangling the relative contribution of demography and selection to genomic patterns of variation is challenging, however, it is clear that although D. melanogaster was thought to share demographic history with D. simulans different forces are at work in shaping genomic variation in this population of D. simulans.

Indexed as

Genetic VariationSelection, GeneticAnimalsDrosophila melanogasterDrosophila simulansGenetics, PopulationGenomicsGenotypeHaplotypesPolymorphism, GeneticSpecies SpecificityDrosophila simulanspopulation geneticsselection

Identifiers

PMID29228179
PMCPMC5767965

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.