Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29228112›Full record

ReviewBritish medical bulletin2018

Xenotransplantation-the current status and prospects.

D K C Cooper, R Gaston, D Eckhoff, J Ladowski, T Yamamoto, L Wang, H Iwase, H Hara, M Tector, A J Tector

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in British medical bulletin, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 73 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
73citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

73 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Future of xenotransplantation in Korea.Clinical transplantation and research · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. CRISPR-Cas9 in the Tailoring of Genetically Engineered Animals.Current issues in molecular biology · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Harnessing the evolving CRISPR/Cas9 for precision oncology.Journal of translational medicine · 2024
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Precise Gene Knock-In Tools with Minimized Risk of DSBs: A Trend for Gene Manipulation.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Porcine Kidney Organoids Derived from Naïve-like Embryonic Stem Cells.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article

13 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

D K C CooperXenotransplantation Program, Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham Medical Center, Birmingham, AL, USA.
R GastonDepartment of Nephrology, University of Alabama at Birmingham Medical Center, Birmingham, AL, USA.
D EckhoffXenotransplantation Program, Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham Medical Center, Birmingham, AL, USA.
J LadowskiXenotransplantation Program, Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham Medical Center, Birmingham, AL, USA.
T YamamotoXenotransplantation Program, Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham Medical Center, Birmingham, AL, USA.
L WangXenotransplantation Program, Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham Medical Center, Birmingham, AL, USA.
H IwaseXenotransplantation Program, Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham Medical Center, Birmingham, AL, USA.
H HaraXenotransplantation Program, Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham Medical Center, Birmingham, AL, USA.
M TectorXenotransplantation Program, Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham Medical Center, Birmingham, AL, USA.
A J TectorXenotransplantation Program, Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham Medical Center, Birmingham, AL, USA.

Funding

Prolonging life-supported pig kidney and heart graft survival in baboons by suppressing inflammationU19AI090959 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI COOPER, DAVID KC · 2010 to 2024
$26.3M
NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI090959
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: There is a continuing worldwide shortage of organs from deceased human donors for transplantation into patients with end-stage organ failure. Genetically engineered pigs could resolve this problem, and could also provide tissues and cells for the treatment of conditions such as diabetes, Parkinson's disease and corneal blindness. Sources of data: The current literature has been reviewed. Areas of agreement: The pathobiologic barriers are now largely defined. Research progress has advanced through the increasing availability of genetically engineered pigs and novel immunosuppressive agents. Life-supporting pig kidneys and islets have functioned for months or years in nonhuman primates. Areas of controversy: The potential risk of transfer of a pig infectious microorganism to the recipient continues to be debated. Growing points: Increased attention is being paid to selection of patients for initial clinical trials. Areas timely for developing research: Most of the advances required to justify a clinical trial have now been met.

Indexed as

HeterograftsTransplantation, HeterologousAnimalsAnimals, Genetically ModifiedGraft SurvivalHumansSwineTissue and Organ Harvesting

Identifiers

PMID29228112
PMCPMC6487536

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.