Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29228051›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

White blood cell differential count of maturation stages in bone marrow smear using dual-stage convolutional neural networks.

Jin Woo Choi, Yunseo Ku, Byeong Wook Yoo, Jung-Ah Kim, Dong Soon Lee, Young Jun Chai, Hyoun-Joong Kong, Hee Chan Kim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Hematopathology Practice in the Digital Era: What has Changed?International journal of laboratory hematology · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Neutrophil nucleus: shaping the past and the future.Journal of leukocyte biology · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jin Woo ChoiInterdisciplinary Program in Bioengineering, Graduate School, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.
Yunseo KuInterdisciplinary Program in Bioengineering, Graduate School, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.
Byeong Wook YooInterdisciplinary Program in Bioengineering, Graduate School, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.
Jung-Ah KimDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Cancer Research Institute, Seoul, Korea.
Dong Soon LeeDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Cancer Research Institute, Seoul, Korea.
Young Jun ChaiDepartment of Surgery, Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.
Hyoun-Joong KongDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Chungnam National University College of Medicine, Daejeon, Korea.
Hee Chan KimDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2112-426X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The white blood cell differential count of the bone marrow provides information concerning the distribution of immature and mature cells within maturation stages. The results of such examinations are important for the diagnosis of various diseases and for follow-up care after chemotherapy. However, manual, labor-intensive methods to determine the differential count lead to inter- and intra-variations among the results obtained by hematologists. Therefore, an automated system to conduct the white blood cell differential count is highly desirable, but several difficulties hinder progress. There are variations in the white blood cells of each maturation stage, small inter-class differences within each stage, and variations in images because of the different acquisition and staining processes. Moreover, a large number of classes need to be classified for bone marrow smear analysis, and the high density of touching cells in bone marrow smears renders difficult the segmentation of single cells, which is crucial to traditional image processing and machine learning. Few studies have attempted to discriminate bone marrow cells, and even these have either discriminated only a few classes or yielded insufficient performance. In this study, we propose an automated white blood cell differential counting system from bone marrow smear images using a dual-stage convolutional neural network (CNN). A total of 2,174 patch images were collected for training and testing. The dual-stage CNN classified images into 10 classes of the myeloid and erythroid maturation series, and achieved an accuracy of 97.06%, a precision of 97.13%, a recall of 97.06%, and an F-1 score of 97.1%. The proposed method not only showed high classification performance, but also successfully classified raw images without single cell segmentation and manual feature extraction by implementing CNN. Moreover, it demonstrated rotation and location invariance. These results highlight the promise of the proposed method as an automated white blood cell differential count system.

Indexed as

Leukocyte CountNeural Networks, ComputerHumansMachine Learning

Identifiers

PMID29228051
PMCPMC5724840

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.