ArticlePloS one2017
White blood cell differential count of maturation stages in bone marrow smear using dual-stage convolutional neural networks.
Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
32 citing papers in PubMed.
- Machine Learning to Predict Risk of Relapse Using Cytologic Image Markers in Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia Posthematopoietic Cell Transplantation.JCO clinical cancer informatics · 2022Trial
- Hematopathology Practice in the Digital Era: What has Changed?International journal of laboratory hematology · 2026Review
- Deep learning in bone marrow cytomorphology: advances in segmentation, classification, and clinical translation.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2025Review
- Using Artificial Intelligence to Enhance Myelodysplastic Syndrome Diagnosis, Prognosis, and Treatment.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- A deep-learning algorithm (AIFORIA) for classification of hematopoietic cells in bone marrow aspirate smears based on nine cell classes-a feasible approach for routine screening?Journal of hematopathology · 2025Article
- Advancing Laboratory Medicine Practice With Machine Learning: Swift yet Exact.Annals of laboratory medicine · 2025Review
- Evaluation of the practical application of the category-imbalanced myeloid cell classification model.PloS one · 2025Article
- Improving the generalizability of white blood cell classification with few-shot domain adaptation.Journal of pathology informatics · 2024Article
- Article
- Recent advancements in machine learning for bone marrow cell morphology analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Review
- Article
- Neutrophil nucleus: shaping the past and the future.Journal of leukocyte biology · 2023Article
- An Intelligent Attention-Based Transfer Learning Model for Accurate Differentiation of Bone Marrow Stains to Diagnose Hematological Disorder.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Morphological diagnosis of hematologic malignancy using feature fusion-based deep convolutional neural network.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Improved YOLOv7 Algorithm for Detecting Bone Marrow Cells.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- DeepHeme: A generalizable, bone marrow classifier with hematopathologist-level performance.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- Detection of acute promyelocytic leukemia in peripheral blood and bone marrow with annotation-free deep learning.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Classification of Atypical White Blood Cells in Acute Myeloid Leukemia Using a Two-Stage Hybrid Model Based on Deep Convolutional Autoencoder and Deep Convolutional Neural Network.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Hematologic Cancer Detection Using White Blood Cancerous Cells Empowered with Transfer Learning and Image Processing.Journal of healthcare engineering · 2023Article
- Cell projection plots: A novel visualization of bone marrow aspirate cytology.Journal of pathology informatics · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The white blood cell differential count of the bone marrow provides information concerning the distribution of immature and mature cells within maturation stages. The results of such examinations are important for the diagnosis of various diseases and for follow-up care after chemotherapy. However, manual, labor-intensive methods to determine the differential count lead to inter- and intra-variations among the results obtained by hematologists. Therefore, an automated system to conduct the white blood cell differential count is highly desirable, but several difficulties hinder progress. There are variations in the white blood cells of each maturation stage, small inter-class differences within each stage, and variations in images because of the different acquisition and staining processes. Moreover, a large number of classes need to be classified for bone marrow smear analysis, and the high density of touching cells in bone marrow smears renders difficult the segmentation of single cells, which is crucial to traditional image processing and machine learning. Few studies have attempted to discriminate bone marrow cells, and even these have either discriminated only a few classes or yielded insufficient performance. In this study, we propose an automated white blood cell differential counting system from bone marrow smear images using a dual-stage convolutional neural network (CNN). A total of 2,174 patch images were collected for training and testing. The dual-stage CNN classified images into 10 classes of the myeloid and erythroid maturation series, and achieved an accuracy of 97.06%, a precision of 97.13%, a recall of 97.06%, and an F-1 score of 97.1%. The proposed method not only showed high classification performance, but also successfully classified raw images without single cell segmentation and manual feature extraction by implementing CNN. Moreover, it demonstrated rotation and location invariance. These results highlight the promise of the proposed method as an automated white blood cell differential count system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.