ArticleJournal of biophotonics2018
Microscopic investigation of" topically applied nanoparticles for molecular imaging of fresh tissue surfaces.
Article in Journal of biophotonics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Surface modification of plasmonic noble metal-metal oxide core-shell nanoparticles.Nanoscale advances · 2019Review
- Rapid pathology of lumpectomy margins with open-top light-sheet (OTLS) microscopy.Biomedical optics express · 2019Article
- Modeling the binding and diffusion of receptor-targeted nanoparticles topically applied on fresh tissue specimens.Physics in medicine and biology · 2019Article
- Diagnostic performance of receptor-specific surgical specimen staining correlates with receptor expression level.Journal of biomedical optics · 2019Article
- Diagnostic Performance of Receptor-Specific Surgical Specimen Staining Correlate with Receptor Expression Level.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2019Article
- Ratiometric optical nanoprobes enable accurate molecular detection and imaging.Chemical Society reviews · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Previous studies have shown that functionalized nanoparticles (NPs) topically applied on fresh tissues are able to rapidly target cell-surface protein biomarkers of cancer. Furthermore, studies have shown that a paired-agent approach, in which an untargeted NP is co-administered with a panel of targeted NPs, controls for the nonspecific behavior of the NPs, enabling quantitative imaging of biomarker expression. However, given the complexities in nonspecific accumulation, diffusion, and chemical binding of targeted NPs in tissues, studies are needed to better understand these processes at the microscopic scale. Here, fresh tissues were stained with a paired-agent approach, frozen, and sectioned to image the depth-dependent accumulation of targeted and untargeted NPs. The ratio of targeted-to-untargeted NP concentrations-a parameter used to distinguish between tumor and benign tissues-was found to diminish with increasing NP diffusion depths due to nonspecific accumulation and poor washout. It was then hypothesized and experimentally demonstrated that larger NPs would exhibit less diffusion below tissue surfaces, enabling higher targeted-to-untargeted NP ratios. In summary, these methods and investigations have enabled the design of NP agents with improved sensitivity and contrast for rapid molecular imaging of fresh tissues.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.