Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29227473›Full record

ArticleNature chemical biology2018

Structure-inspired design of β-arrestin-biased ligands for aminergic GPCRs.

John D McCorvy, Kyle V Butler, Brendan Kelly, Katie Rechsteiner, Joel Karpiak, Robin M Betz, Bethany L Kormos, Brian K Shoichet, Ron O Dror, Jian Jin and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature chemical biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 102 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
102citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

102 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. The Art and Science of Molecular Docking.Annual review of biochemistry · 2024
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Biased Dopamine DBiomolecules & therapeutics · 2024
    Article

42 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

John D McCorvyNational Institute of Mental Health Psychoactive Drug Screening Program, Department of Pharmacology and Division of Chemical Biology and Medicinal Chemistry, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill Medical School, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Kyle V ButlerCenter for Chemical Biology and Drug Discovery, Departments of Pharmacological Sciences and Oncological Sciences, Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.
Brendan KellyDepartments of Computer Science and Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Institute for Computational and Mathematical Engineering, and Biophysics Program, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
Katie RechsteinerNational Institute of Mental Health Psychoactive Drug Screening Program, Department of Pharmacology and Division of Chemical Biology and Medicinal Chemistry, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill Medical School, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Joel KarpiakDepartment of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, University of California at San Francisco, Byers Hall, San Francisco, California, USA.
Robin M BetzDepartments of Computer Science and Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Institute for Computational and Mathematical Engineering, and Biophysics Program, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
Bethany L KormosNeuroscience and Pain Medicinal Chemistry, Pfizer Worldwide R&D, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Brian K ShoichetDepartment of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, University of California at San Francisco, Byers Hall, San Francisco, California, USA.
Ron O DrorDepartments of Computer Science and Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Institute for Computational and Mathematical Engineering, and Biophysics Program, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
Jian JinCenter for Chemical Biology and Drug Discovery, Departments of Pharmacological Sciences and Oncological Sciences, Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2387-3862
Bryan L RothNational Institute of Mental Health Psychoactive Drug Screening Program, Department of Pharmacology and Division of Chemical Biology and Medicinal Chemistry, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill Medical School, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.

Funding

Screening CoreU19MH082441 · NIMH · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI CARON, MARC G., WETSEL, WILLIAM C · 2007 to 2016
$15.2M
Illuminating the Druggable GPCR-omeU24DK116195 · NIDDK · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI ROTH, BRYAN L., SHOICHET, BRIAN K · 2017 to 2022
$14.3M
Development and Testing of New Computational Methods for Ligand Discovery and MechanismR35GM122481 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI Brian K Shoichet · 2017 to 2026
$8.5M
Molecular Biophysics Training Program at StanfordT32GM008294 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI HUANG, KERWYN C. · 1989 to 2019
$7.4M
Molecular Details of Psychoactive Drug ActionsR01MH112205 · NIMH · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Bryan L. Roth, Brian K Shoichet · 2017 to 2026
$6.1M
DESIGN AND EXPERIMENTAL TESTING OF NEW DOCKING METHODSR01GM059957 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI SHOICHET, BRIAN K · 1999 to 2017
$4.4M
Exploiting Dopamine Receptor Functional Selectivity as an Approach to Treat Parkinson's SymptomsR01NS100930 · NINDS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI CARON, MARC G. · 2017 to 2021
$3.2M
DREADD2.0: AN ENHANCED CHEMOGENETIC TOOLKITU01MH105892 · NIMH · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI JIN, JIAN, KASH, THOMAS L. · 2014 to 2016
$3.0M
NIDDK NIH HHS U24 DK116195NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM059957NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM122481NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008294NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH112205NIMH NIH HHS U01 MH105892NIMH NIH HHS U19 MH082441NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS100930
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Development of biased ligands targeting G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) is a promising approach for current drug discovery. Although structure-based drug design of biased agonists remains challenging even with an abundance of GPCR crystal structures, we present an approach for translating GPCR structural data into β-arrestin-biased ligands for aminergic GPCRs. We identified specific amino acid-ligand contacts at transmembrane helix 5 (TM5) and extracellular loop 2 (EL2) responsible for Gi/o and β-arrestin signaling, respectively, and targeted those residues to develop biased ligands. For these ligands, we found that bias is conserved at other aminergic GPCRs that retain similar residues at TM5 and EL2. Our approach provides a template for generating arrestin-biased ligands by modifying predicted ligand interactions that block TM5 interactions and promote EL2 interactions. This strategy may facilitate the structure-guided design of arrestin-biased ligands at other GPCRs, including polypharmacological biased ligands.

Indexed as

LigandsAripiprazolebeta-Arrestin 1Crystallography, X-RayCyclic AMPDrug DesignDrug DiscoveryHEK293 CellsHumansHydrogen BondingIndolesKineticsMolecular Dynamics SimulationMutationProtein BindingProtein ConformationAripiprazoleARRB1 protein, humanbeta-Arrestin 1Cyclic AMPIndolesLigandsReceptors, G-Protein-CoupledSerine

Identifiers

PMID29227473
PMCPMC5771956

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.