ArticleJournal of public health management and practice : JPHMP
Lessons Learned From the Environmental Public Health Tracking Sub-County Data Pilot Project.
Article in Journal of public health management and practice : JPHMP. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evaluating methods to define place of residence in Canadian administrative data and the impact on observed associations with all-cause mortality in type 2 diabetes.BMC medical research methodology · 2025Article
- Examining select sociodemographic characteristics of sub-county geographies for public health surveillance.Population health metrics · 2024Article
- Capturing emergency dispatch address points as geocoding candidates to quantify delimited confidence in residential geolocation.International journal of health geographics · 2023Article
- Developing a National-Scale Exposure Index for Combined Environmental Hazards and Social Stressors and Applications to the Environmental Influences on Child Health Outcomes (ECHO) Cohort.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
- Feasibility of visualizing cancer incidence data at sub-county level: Findings from 21 National Program of Cancer Registries.Spatial and spatio-temporal epidemiology · 2023Article
- Area deprivation index and segregation on the risk of HIV: a U.S. Veteran case-control study.Lancet regional health. Americas · 2023Article
- Common and Unique Barriers to the Exchange of Administrative Healthcare Data in Environmental Public Health Tracking Program.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- COVID-19 Community Incidence and Associated Neighborhood-Level Characteristics in Houston, Texas, USA.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- Well-Being in the Nation: A Living Library of Measures to Drive Multi-Sector Population Health Improvement and Address Social Determinants.The Milbank quarterly · 2020Article
- Developing a surveillance system of sub-county data: Finding suitable population thresholds for geographic aggregations.Spatial and spatio-temporal epidemiology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveSmall area data are key to better understanding the complex relationships between environmental health, health outcomes, and risk factors at a local level. In 2014, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's National Environmental Public Health Tracking Program (Tracking Program) conducted the Sub-County Data Pilot Project with grantees to consider integration of sub-county data into the National Environmental Public Health Tracking Network (Tracking Network).
designThe Tracking Program and grantees developed sub-county-level data for several data sets during this pilot project, working to standardize processes for submitting data and creating required geographies. Grantees documented challenges they encountered during the pilot project and documented decisions.
resultsThis article covers the challenges revealed during the project. It includes insights into geocoding, aggregation, population estimates, and data stability and provides recommendations for moving forward.
conclusionNational standards for generating, analyzing, and sharing sub-county data should be established to build a system of sub-county data that allow for comparison of outcomes, geographies, and time. Increasing the availability and accessibility of small area data will not only enhance the Tracking Network's capabilities but also contribute to an improved understanding of environmental health and informed decision making at a local level.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.