Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29227004›Full record

ArticleThe journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research2018

Recurrence of uterine myoma after myomectomy: Open myomectomy versus laparoscopic myomectomy.

Yasushi Kotani, Takako Tobiume, Risa Fujishima, Mamoru Shigeta, Hisamitsu Takaya, Hidekatsu Nakai, Ayako Suzuki, Isao Tsuji, Masaki Mandai, Noriomi Matsumura

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed, 111 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. A logistic regression model for predicting postoperative recurrence of cellular uterine leiomyoma.European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology: X · 2026
    Article
  4. Surgical management of uterine fibroids.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Fibroids and pregnancy.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Intraoperative laparoscopic ultrasound during laparoscopic myomectomy: a narrative review.Journal of the Turkish German Gynecological Association · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Yasushi KotaniDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka-Sayama, Japan.
Takako TobiumeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka-Sayama, Japan.
Risa FujishimaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka-Sayama, Japan.
Mamoru ShigetaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka-Sayama, Japan.
Hisamitsu TakayaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka-Sayama, Japan.
Hidekatsu NakaiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka-Sayama, Japan.
Ayako SuzukiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka-Sayama, Japan.
Isao TsujiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka-Sayama, Japan.
Masaki MandaiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kyoto Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Noriomi MatsumuraDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka-Sayama, Japan.
Kindai University Hospital · JPKindai University · JPKyoto University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimOpen myomectomy (OM) was previously frequently performed; however, laparoscopic myomectomy (LM) has recently become more common. Nevertheless, myoma can recur after both LM and OM. In this study, we report our retrospective investigation of myoma recurrence by comparing LM and OM.

methodsA total of 474 patients underwent LM and 279 patients underwent OM. The patients were followed-up postoperatively from six months to eight years. Recurrence was confirmed when a myoma with a diameter of ≥ 1 cm was detected. Post-LM, post-OM and cumulative recurrence rates were investigated, and a Cox hazard test was performed.

resultsThe cumulative recurrence rates between the two groups were 76.2% (LM) vs. 63.4% (OM) at eight years postoperatively. A log-rank test revealed a significant difference between the two groups. Cox hazard testing revealed that LM, a larger number of enucleated myoma masses and the absence of postoperative gestation significantly contributed to the postoperative recurrence rate.

conclusionsLM yielded a higher recurrence rate than OM, likely a result of manual myoma removal in OM, which is a more exhaustive extraction of smaller myoma masses than performed in LM. In other words, fewer residual myoma masses after OM contribute to a lower postoperative recurrence rate.

Indexed as

AdultFemaleHumansLeiomyomaMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalRetrospective StudiesUterine MyomectomyUterine NeoplasmsYoung Adultlaparoscopic myomectomylaparoscopic surgeryopen myomectomyrecurrenceuterine myoma

Identifiers

PMID29227004
PMCPMC5836951
OpenAlexW2771421514

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.