Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29226988›Full record

ArticleBrain pathology (Zurich, Switzerland)2018

CNS high-grade neuroepithelial tumor with BCOR internal tandem duplication: a comparison with its counterparts in the kidney and soft tissue.

Yuka Yoshida, Sumihito Nobusawa, Satoshi Nakata, Mitsutoshi Nakada, Yoshiki Arakawa, Yohei Mineharu, Yasuo Sugita, Takako Yoshioka, Asuka Araki, Yuichiro Sato and 8 more

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Brain pathology (Zurich, Switzerland), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 121 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 10 institutions in 1 country.

Yuka YoshidaDepartment of Human Pathology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Maebashi, Japan.
Sumihito NobusawaDepartment of Human Pathology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Maebashi, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-9434-8400
Satoshi NakataDepartment of Human Pathology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Maebashi, Japan.
Mitsutoshi NakadaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kanazawa University, Kanazawa, Japan.
Yoshiki ArakawaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Yohei MineharuDepartment of Neurosurgery, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Yasuo SugitaDepartment of Pathology, Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Japan.
Takako YoshiokaDepartment of Pathology, National Center for Child Health and Development, Tokyo, Japan.
Asuka ArakiDepartment of Organ Pathology, Shimane University School of Medicine, Izumo, Japan.
Yuichiro SatoDepartment of Diagnostic Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Miyazaki, Miyazaki, Japan.
Hideo TakeshimaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Division of Clinical Neuroscience, Faculty of Medicine, University of Miyazaki, Miyazaki, Japan.
Masahiko OkadaDepartment of Pediatrics, Nagasaki University School of Medicine, Nagasaki, Japan.
Akira NishiDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, Gunma Children's Medical Center, Shibukawa, Japan.
Tatsuya YamazakiDepartment of Human Pathology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Maebashi, Japan.
Kenichi KohashiDepartment of Anatomic Pathology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.
Yoshinao OdaDepartment of Anatomic Pathology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.
Junko HiratoDepartment of Pathology, Gunma University Hospital, Maebashi, Japan.
Hideaki YokooDepartment of Human Pathology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Maebashi, Japan.
Gunma University · JPGunma Children's Medical Center · JPKyoto University · JPKyushu University · JPUniversity of Miyazaki · JPKanazawa University · JPKurume University · JPNagasaki University · JPNational Center For Child Health and Development · JPShimane University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Central nervous system high-grade neuroepithelial tumors with BCOR alteration (CNS HGNET-BCOR) are a recently reported rare entity, identified as a small fraction of tumors previously institutionally diagnosed as so-called CNS primitive neuroectodermal tumors. Their genetic characteristic is a somatic internal tandem duplication in the 3' end of BCOR (BCOR ITD), which has also been found in clear cell sarcomas of the kidney (CCSK) and soft tissue undifferentiated round cell sarcomas/primitive myxoid mesenchymal tumors of infancy (URCS/PMMTI), and these BCOR ITD-positive tumors have been reported to share similar pathological features. In this study, we performed a clinicopathological and molecular analysis of six cases of CNS HGNET-BCOR, and compared them with their counterparts in the kidney and soft tissue. Although these tumors had histologically similar structural patterns and characteristic monotonous nuclei with fine chromatin, CNS HGNET-BCOR exhibited glial cell morphology, ependymoma-like perivascular pseudorosettes and palisading necrosis, whereas these features were not evident in CCSK or URCS/PMMTI. Immunohistochemically, diffuse staining of Olig2 with a mixture of varying degrees of intensity, and only focal staining of GFAP, S-100 protein and synaptophysin were observed in CNS HGNET-BCOR, whereas these common neuroepithelial markers were negative in CCSK and URCS/PMMTI. Therefore, although CNS HGNET-BCOR, CCSK and URCS/PMMTI may constitute a group of BCOR ITD-positive tumors, only CNS HGNET-BCOR has histological features suggestive of glial differentiation. In conclusion, we think CNS HGNET-BCOR are a certain type of neuroepithelial tumor relatively close to glioma, not CCSK or URCS/PMMTI occurring in the CNS.

Indexed as

BrainCentral Nervous System NeoplasmsChildChild, PreschoolExonsFemaleHumansInfantKidneyKidney NeoplasmsMaleNeoplasms, NeuroepithelialOligodendrocyte Transcription Factor 2Proto-Oncogene ProteinsRepressor ProteinsSarcomaBCOR protein, humanOLIG2 protein, humanOligodendrocyte Transcription Factor 2Proto-Oncogene ProteinsRepressor ProteinsBCOR ITDclear cell sarcoma of the kidneyhigh-grade neuroepithelial tumor

Identifiers

PMID29226988
PMCPMC8028450
OpenAlexW2775575362

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.