ArticleStatistical methods in medical research2019
Collaborative-controlled LASSO for constructing propensity score-based estimators in high-dimensional data.
Article in Statistical methods in medical research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.
- The world's longest running civil war and chronic childhood undernutrition in Myanmar: a propensity score matched analysis.Journal of health, population, and nutrition · 2026Article
- Tuning LASSO Models for Propensity Score Weighting and Using Synthetic Negative Control Exposures for Residual Bias Detection.Statistics in medicine · 2026Article
- Note on targeted learning with an undersmoothed Lasso propensity score model for large-scale covariate adjustment in health care database studies.American journal of epidemiology · 2025Article
- Commentary on ``Nonparametric identification is not enough, but randomized controlled trials are'': Statistical considerations for generating reliable evidence across a spectrum of studies that increasingly involve real-world elements.Observational studies · 2025Article
- Targeted learning with an undersmoothed LASSO propensity score model for large-scale covariate adjustment in health-care database studies.American journal of epidemiology · 2024Article
- A Dynamic Prognostic Model for Identifying Vulnerable COVID-19 Patients at High Risk of Rapid Deterioration.Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety · 2024Article
- Scalable Feature Engineering from Electronic Free Text Notes to Supplement Confounding Adjustment of Claims-Based Pharmacoepidemiologic Studies.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2023Article
- Article
- An application of the Causal Roadmap in two safety monitoring case studies: Causal inference and outcome prediction using electronic health record data.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2023Article
- Machine learning for improving high-dimensional proxy confounder adjustment in healthcare database studies: An overview of the current literature.Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety · 2022Review
- Synthetic Negative Controls: Using Simulation to Screen Large-scale Propensity Score Analyses.Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2022Article
- Evaluating the robustness of targeted maximum likelihood estimators via realistic simulations in nutrition intervention trials.Statistics in medicine · 2022Article
- Identification of necroptosis-related genes for predicting prognosis and exploring immune infiltration landscape in colon adenocarcinoma.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- When Can Nonrandomized Studies Support Valid Inference Regarding Effectiveness or Safety of New Medical Treatments?Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2022Review
- Identification of a ferroptosis-related gene signature predictive model in colon cancer.World journal of surgical oncology · 2021Article
- Theory meets practice: a commentary on VanderWeele's 'principles of confounder selection'.European journal of epidemiology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Propensity score-based estimators are increasingly used for causal inference in observational studies. However, model selection for propensity score estimation in high-dimensional data has received little attention. In these settings, propensity score models have traditionally been selected based on the goodness-of-fit for the treatment mechanism itself, without consideration of the causal parameter of interest. Collaborative minimum loss-based estimation is a novel methodology for causal inference that takes into account information on the causal parameter of interest when selecting a propensity score model. This "collaborative learning" considers variable associations with both treatment and outcome when selecting a propensity score model in order to minimize a bias-variance tradeoff in the estimated treatment effect. In this study, we introduce a novel approach for collaborative model selection when using the LASSO estimator for propensity score estimation in high-dimensional covariate settings. To demonstrate the importance of selecting the propensity score model collaboratively, we designed quasi-experiments based on a real electronic healthcare database, where only the potential outcomes were manually generated, and the treatment and baseline covariates remained unchanged. Results showed that the collaborative minimum loss-based estimation algorithm outperformed other competing estimators for both point estimation and confidence interval coverage. In addition, the propensity score model selected by collaborative minimum loss-based estimation could be applied to other propensity score-based estimators, which also resulted in substantive improvement for both point estimation and confidence interval coverage. We illustrate the discussed concepts through an empirical example comparing the effects of non-selective nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs with selective COX-2 inhibitors on gastrointestinal complications in a population of Medicare beneficiaries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.