Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29226626›Full record

Trial reportPharmacology research & perspectives2017

Randomized clinical study of safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of RIPK1 inhibitor GSK2982772 in healthy volunteers.

Kathleen Weisel, Nicola E Scott, Debra J Tompson, Bartholomew J Votta, Sujith Madhavan, Kat Povey, Allen Wolstenholme, Monica Simeoni, Todd Rudo, Lauren Richards-Peterson and 10 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Pharmacology research & perspectives, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 73 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
73citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

73 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 125 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Mechanisms, regulation and clinical relevance of necroptosis.Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology · 2026
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

13 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Kathleen WeiselGlaxoSmithKline, Collegeville, PA, USA.
Nicola E ScottGlaxoSmithKline, Stevenage, UK.
Debra J TompsonGlaxoSmithKline, Stevenage, UK.
Bartholomew J VottaGlaxoSmithKline, Collegeville, PA, USA.
Sujith MadhavanGlaxoSmithKline, Cambridge, UK.
Kat PoveyGlaxoSmithKline, Stevenage, UK.
Allen WolstenholmeGlaxoSmithKline, Collegeville, PA, USA.
Monica SimeoniGlaxoSmithKline, Stevenage, UK.
Todd RudoGlaxoSmithKline, Collegeville, PA, USA.
Lauren Richards-PetersonGlaxoSmithKline, Stevenage, UK.
Tarjinder SahotaGlaxoSmithKline, Cambridge, UK.
J Gene WangGlaxoSmithKline, Collegeville, PA, USA.
John LichGlaxoSmithKline, Collegeville, PA, USA.
Joshua FingerGlaxoSmithKline, Collegeville, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3240-9778
Adeline VerticelliGlaxoSmithKline, Collegeville, PA, USA.
Michael ReillyGlaxoSmithKline, Collegeville, PA, USA.
Peter J GoughGlaxoSmithKline, Collegeville, PA, USA.
Philip A HarrisGlaxoSmithKline, Collegeville, PA, USA.
John BertinGlaxoSmithKline, Collegeville, PA, USA.
Mei-Lun WangGlaxoSmithKline, Collegeville, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2735-9833
GlaxoSmithKline (United States) · USGlaxoSmithKline (United Kingdom) · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

GSK2982772 is a highly selective inhibitor of receptor-interacting protein kinase 1 (RIPK1) being developed to treat chronic inflammatory diseases. This first-in-human study evaluated safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), and exploratory pharmacodynamics (PD) of GSK2982772 administered orally to healthy male volunteers. This was a Phase I, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study. In Part A, subjects received single ascending doses of GSK2982772 (0.1-120 mg) or placebo in a crossover design during each of 4 treatment periods. In Part B, subjects received repeat doses of GSK2982772 (20 mg once daily [QD] to up to 120 mg twice daily [BID]) or placebo for 14 days. Part C was an open-label relative bioavailability study comparing 20-mg tablets vs capsules. Safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), RIPK1 target engagement (TE), and pharmacodynamics (PD) were assessed. The most common adverse events (AEs) were contact dermatitis and headache. Most AEs were mild in intensity, and there were no deaths or serious AEs. The PK of GSK2982772 was approximately linear over the dose range studied (up to 120 mg BID). There was no evidence of drug accumulation upon repeat dosing. Greater than 90% RIPK1 TE was achieved over a 24-hour period for the 60-mg and 120-mg BID dosing regimens. Single and repeat doses of GSK2982772 were safe and well tolerated. PK profiles showed dose linearity. The high levels of RIPK1 TE support progression into Phase II clinical trials for further clinical development.

Indexed as

AdultArea Under CurveCross-Over StudiesDose-Response Relationship, DrugDouble-Blind MethodDrug Administration ScheduleHealthy VolunteersHumansMaleMiddle AgedProtein Kinase InhibitorsReceptor-Interacting Protein Serine-Threonine KinasesSmall Molecule LibrariesYoung AdultProtein Kinase InhibitorsReceptor-Interacting Protein Serine-Threonine KinasesRIPK1 protein, humanSmall Molecule Librariesanti-inflammatory agentsGSK2982772pharmacodynamicspharmacokineticsRIPK1safety

Identifiers

PMID29226626
PMCPMC5723699
OpenAlexW2766254647

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.