Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29226606›Full record

ArticleZoonoses and public health2018

The challenges of implementing an integrated One Health surveillance system in Australia.

I Johnson, A Hansen, P Bi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Zoonoses and public health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Why One Health struggles: A critical analysis.One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Proposed approaches for public health surveillance: A literature review for the Canadian National HIV Surveillance Program.Canada communicable disease report = Releve des maladies transmissibles au Canada · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. A systematic review of global Q fever outbreaks.One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2024
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Editorial: Urban green spaces and human health.Frontiers in public health · 2024
    Article
  17. Public awareness of One Health in China.One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2023
    Article
  18. Global prioritization of endemic zoonotic diseases for conducting surveillance in domestic animals to protect public health.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Article
  19. One Health and Australian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Communities: A One Health Pilot Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

I JohnsonSchool of Public Health, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2854-7748
A HansenSchool of Public Health, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
P BiSchool of Public Health, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As 75 per cent of emerging infectious diseases are of animal origin, a One Health approach that integrates the health of humans, animals and the environment could provide an earlier opportunity for zoonotic disease detection and prevention. In Australia, human, animal and ecological health are managed by separate sectors with limited communication. This study aims to explore how professionals in these fields perceive a One Health approach to zoonotic disease surveillance, aiming to identify the challenges to the implementation of an integrated system in Australia. Using a qualitative research method, ten semistructured interviews were conducted with academic experts to gain insight into the possibility of developing an integrated surveillance system in Australia. A thematic analysis of the data was undertaken. Findings showed the absence of a clear definition and subsequent vision for the future of One Health act as a barrier to interdisciplinary collaboration, and that siloed approaches by different sectors restrict the ability for professionals to work collaboratively across disciplines. An understanding of disease transmission was considered by participants to be a necessary requirement for a successful One Health approach. Finally, participants considered political will an essential requirement for the integration of surveillance systems. This study demonstrates that for a One Health approach to be implemented in an Australian setting, those working in the fields of human, animal and ecological health must agree on several aspects. The establishment of a formal governance body with representatives from each sector could assist in overcoming long-standing barriers of privacy and distrust. Further, developing interdisciplinary training in One Health concepts for medical, environmental and veterinary students may encourage cross-disciplinary collaboration. Finally, demonstrating to policymakers the economic benefit of improved and timely detection of zoonoses may help in facilitating a structured One Health approach to disease surveillance in Australia.

Indexed as

One HealthAnimalsAustraliaHealth PolicyHumansInterdisciplinary CommunicationPopulation SurveillanceZoonosesinfectious diseaseOne Healthpublic healthsurveillancezoonoses

Identifiers

PMID29226606
PMCPMC7165821

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.