ArticleThe British journal of developmental psychology2018
Which limb is it? Responses to vibrotactile stimulation in early infancy.
Article in The British journal of developmental psychology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Individual differences in how infants change behaviours from spontaneous to instrumental.Communications psychology · 2025Article
- Effects of pitch and musical sounds on body-representations when moving with sound.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- The development of body representations: an associative learning account.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2021Review
- Body representation in infants: Categorical boundaries of body parts as assessed by somatosensory mismatch negativity.Developmental cognitive neuroscience · 2020Article
- Development of body knowledge as measured by arm differentiation in infants: From global to local?The British journal of developmental psychology · 2020Article
- Importance of body representations in social-cognitive development: New insights from infant brain science.Progress in brain research · 2020Review
- Sensorimotor Contingencies as a Key Drive of Development: From Babies to Robots.Frontiers in neurorobotics · 2019Review
- Touching! An Augmented Reality System for Unveiling Face Topography in Very Young Children.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2019Article
- How Cognitive Models of Human Body Experience Might Push Robotics.Frontiers in neurorobotics · 2019Article
- Neural measures of anticipatory bodily attention in children: Relations with executive function.Developmental cognitive neuroscience · 2018Article
- Interpersonal Influences on Body Representations in the Infant Brain.Frontiers in psychology · 2018Article
- A Naturalistic Observation of Spontaneous Touches to the Body and Environment in the First 2 Months of Life.Frontiers in psychology · 2018Article
- Fetal Origin of Sensorimotor Behavior.Frontiers in neurorobotics · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study focuses on how the body schema develops during the first months of life, by investigating infants' motor responses to localized vibrotactile stimulation on their limbs. Vibrotactile stimulation was provided by small buzzers that were attached to the infants' four limbs one at a time. Four age groups were compared cross-sectionally (3-, 4-, 5-, and 6-month-olds). We show that before they actually reach for the buzzer, which, according to previous studies, occurs around 7-8 months of age, infants demonstrate emerging knowledge about their body's configuration by producing specific movement patterns associated with the stimulated body area. At 3 months, infants responded with an increase in general activity when the buzzer was placed on the body, independently of the vibrator's location. Differentiated topographical awareness of the body seemed to appear around 5 months, with specific responses resulting from stimulation of the hands emerging first, followed by the differentiation of movement patterns associated with the stimulation of the feet. Qualitative analyses revealed specific movement types reliably associated with each stimulated location by 6 months of age, possibly preparing infants' ability to actually reach for the vibrating target. We discuss this result in relation to newborns' ability to learn specific movement patterns through intersensory contingency. Statement of contribution what is already known on infants' sensorimotor knowledge about their own bodies 3-month-olds readily learn to produce specific limb movements to obtain a desired effect (movement of a mobile). infants detect temporal and spatial correspondences between events involving their own body and visual events. what the present study adds until 4-5 months of age, infants mostly produce general motor responses to localized touch. this is because in the present study, infants could not rely on immediate contingent feedback. we propose a cephalocaudal developmental trend of topographic differentiation of body areas.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.