Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29226463›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of developmental psychology2018

Which limb is it? Responses to vibrotactile stimulation in early infancy.

Eszter Somogyi, Lisa Jacquey, Tobias Heed, Matej Hoffmann, Jeffrey J Lockman, Lionel Granjon, Jacqueline Fagard, J Kevin O'Regan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of developmental psychology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Fetal Origin of Sensorimotor Behavior.Frontiers in neurorobotics · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Eszter SomogyiLaboratoire Psychologie de la Perception, Centre Biomédical des Saints-Pères, Université Paris Descartes, CNRS UMR 8242, France.ORCID 0000-0002-3935-3933
Lisa JacqueyLaboratoire Psychologie de la Perception, Centre Biomédical des Saints-Pères, Université Paris Descartes, CNRS UMR 8242, France.
Tobias HeedBiopsychology & Cognitive Neuroscience, Faculty of Psychology & Sports Science and Center of Excellence "Cognitive Interaction Technology", Bielefeld University, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5632-6091
Matej HoffmannCenter for Machine Perception, Department of Cybernetics, Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Czech Technical University, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0001-8137-3412
Jeffrey J LockmanDepartment of Psychology, Tulane University, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA.
Lionel GranjonLaboratoire Psychologie de la Perception, Centre Biomédical des Saints-Pères, Université Paris Descartes, CNRS UMR 8242, France.
Jacqueline FagardLaboratoire Psychologie de la Perception, Centre Biomédical des Saints-Pères, Université Paris Descartes, CNRS UMR 8242, France.
J Kevin O'ReganLaboratoire Psychologie de la Perception, Centre Biomédical des Saints-Pères, Université Paris Descartes, CNRS UMR 8242, France.

Funding

Origins of hand-mouth coordination: Objects to toolsR01HD067581 · NICHD · TULANE UNIVERSITY OF LOUISIANA · PI LOCKMAN, JEFFREY J. · 2011 to 2015
$1.6M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD067581
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study focuses on how the body schema develops during the first months of life, by investigating infants' motor responses to localized vibrotactile stimulation on their limbs. Vibrotactile stimulation was provided by small buzzers that were attached to the infants' four limbs one at a time. Four age groups were compared cross-sectionally (3-, 4-, 5-, and 6-month-olds). We show that before they actually reach for the buzzer, which, according to previous studies, occurs around 7-8 months of age, infants demonstrate emerging knowledge about their body's configuration by producing specific movement patterns associated with the stimulated body area. At 3 months, infants responded with an increase in general activity when the buzzer was placed on the body, independently of the vibrator's location. Differentiated topographical awareness of the body seemed to appear around 5 months, with specific responses resulting from stimulation of the hands emerging first, followed by the differentiation of movement patterns associated with the stimulation of the feet. Qualitative analyses revealed specific movement types reliably associated with each stimulated location by 6 months of age, possibly preparing infants' ability to actually reach for the vibrating target. We discuss this result in relation to newborns' ability to learn specific movement patterns through intersensory contingency. Statement of contribution what is already known on infants' sensorimotor knowledge about their own bodies 3-month-olds readily learn to produce specific limb movements to obtain a desired effect (movement of a mobile). infants detect temporal and spatial correspondences between events involving their own body and visual events. what the present study adds until 4-5 months of age, infants mostly produce general motor responses to localized touch. this is because in the present study, infants could not rely on immediate contingent feedback. we propose a cephalocaudal developmental trend of topographic differentiation of body areas.

Indexed as

Child DevelopmentCross-Sectional StudiesExtremitiesFemaleHumansInfantInfant BehaviorMaleMovementPhysical StimulationTouch PerceptionVibrationearly body schemalimb movement differentiationmotor developmentmovement coordinationtopographical body knowledgetouch

Identifiers

PMID29226463
PMCPMC6120485

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.