Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29226231›Full record

ArticleGMS journal for medical education2017

The postgraduate medical education pathway: an international comparison.

Margot M Weggemans, Bruce van Dijk, Birgit van Dooijeweert, Anne G Veenendaal, Olle Ten Cate

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in GMS journal for medical education, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Mentorship of US Medical Students: a Systematic Review.Journal of general internal medicine · 2019
    Pooled it
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Medical Education Reform in China in the 21st Century: A Literature Review.Advances in medical education and practice · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Margot M WeggemansUniversity Medical Centre Utrecht, Centre for Research and Development of Education, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Bruce van DijkUniversity Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Birgit van DooijeweertUniversity Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Anne G VeenendaalUniversity Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Olle Ten CateUniversity Medical Centre Utrecht, Centre for Research and Development of Education, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An at first sight seemingly coherent, global medical workforce, with clearly recognizable specialities, subspecialties and primary care doctors, appears at a closer look quite variable. Even within the most progressive countries as to the development of medical education, with educators who regularly meet at conferences and share major journals about medical education, the differences in structures and regulations are big. This contribution focuses on the preparation, admission policy, duration, examinations, and national competency frameworks in postgraduate speciality training in Germany, the USA, Canada, the UK, Australia and the Netherlands. While general objectives for postgraduate training programs have not been very clear, only recently competency-frameworks, created in a limited number of countries, serve harmonize objectives. This process appears to be a challenge and the recent creation of milestones for the reporting on progress of individual trainees (in the US and in Canada in different ways) and the adoption of entrustable professional activities, a most recent concept that is quickly spreading internationally as a framework for teaching and assessing in the clinical workplace is an interesting and hopeful development, but time will tell whether true harmonization across countries will happen.

Indexed as

Education, Medical, GraduateAustraliaCanadaGermanyInternationalityNetherlandsnational licensing examinationspostgraduate medical educationresidency programspecialty trainingundergraduate medical education

Identifiers

PMID29226231
PMCPMC5704606

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.