Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29226211›Full record

ArticleData in brief2018

An 18-subject EEG data collection using a visual-oddball task, designed for benchmarking algorithms and headset performance comparisons.

Kay Robbins, Kyung-Min Su, W David Hairston

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Data in brief, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Wearable EEG and beyond.Biomedical engineering letters · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kay RobbinsDepartment of Computer Science, University of Texas-San Antonio, San Antonio, TX 78249, USA.
Kyung-Min SuDepartment of Computer Science, University of Texas-San Antonio, San Antonio, TX 78249, USA.
W David HairstonHuman Research and Engineering Directorate, US Army Research Laboratory, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD 21005, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This data note describes an 18-subject EEG (electroencephalogram) data collection from an experiment in which subjects performed a standard visual oddball task. Several research projects have used this data to test artifact detection, classification, transfer learning, EEG preprocessing, blink detection, and automated annotation algorithms. We are releasing the data in three formats to enable benchmarking of EEG algorithms in many areas. The data was acquired using a Biosemi Active 2 EEG headset and includes 64 channels of EEG, 4 channels of EOG (electrooculogram), and 2 mastoid reference channels.

Indexed as

EEGEEGLABEEG study format (ESS)Hierarchical event descriptor (HED) tagsVisually evoked potential

Identifiers

PMID29226211
PMCPMC5712810

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.