ReviewChemistryOpen2017
Fluorescence Sensing with Cellulose-Based Materials.
Review in ChemistryOpen, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.
- Long-Term Functional Stability of Organic and Inorganic Modified Luminescent Lyocell Fibers for Security Applications.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Convenient colorimetric approach to quantify CuO NPs in water using only a smartphone and cellulose paper with an immobilised chemosensor.Mikrochimica acta · 2025Article
- Paper-Based Sensors: Fantasy or Reality?Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Review
- Development of Biopolymer and Conducting Polymer-Based Optical Sensors for Heavy Metal Ion Detection.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- Rapid Discovery and Structure-Property Relationships of Metal-Ion Fluorescent Sensors via Macroarray Synthesis.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Virtual Issue: Chemosensors.ChemistryOpen · 2018Article
- Encapsulation of Cadmium Selenide Nanocrystals in Biocompatible Nanotubes: DFT Calculations, X-ray Diffraction Investigations, and Confocal Fluorescence Imaging.ChemistryOpen · 2018Article
- Fluorescence Sensing with Cellulose-Based Materials.ChemistryOpen · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cellulose-based materials functionalized with fluorescence sensors are highly topical and are employed in many areas of functional materials, including the sensing of heavy-metal ions and anions as well as being widely used as chemical sensors and tools for environmental applications. In this Review, we cover recent progress in the development of cellulose-based fluorescence sensors as parts of membranes and nanoscale materials for the detection of biological analytes. We believe that this Review will be of interest to chemists, chemical engineers, and biochemists in the sensor community as well as researchers working with biological material systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.