Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29226033›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2017

Patterns in artisanal coral reef fisheries revealed through local monitoring efforts.

David G Delaney, Lida T Teneva, Kostantinos A Stamoulis, Jonatha L Giddens, Haruko Koike, Tom Ogawa, Alan M Friedlander, John N Kittinger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Emerging human dimensions research in coastal and nearshore Oceania.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

David G DelaneyDepartment of Biology, Fisheries Ecology Research Laboratory, University of Hawai'i, Honolulu, HI, USA.
Lida T TenevaCenter for Oceans, Conservation International, Honolulu, HI, USA.
Kostantinos A StamoulisDepartment of Biology, Fisheries Ecology Research Laboratory, University of Hawai'i, Honolulu, HI, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2688-4695
Jonatha L GiddensDepartment of Biology, Fisheries Ecology Research Laboratory, University of Hawai'i, Honolulu, HI, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4999-2245
Haruko KoikeDepartment of Biology, Fisheries Ecology Research Laboratory, University of Hawai'i, Honolulu, HI, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1967-3283
Tom OgawaDivision of Aquatic Resources (DAR), Department of Land and Natural Resources, Honolulu, HI, USA.
Alan M FriedlanderDepartment of Biology, Fisheries Ecology Research Laboratory, University of Hawai'i, Honolulu, HI, USA.
John N KittingerCenter for Oceans, Conservation International, Honolulu, HI, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8799-7373

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sustainable fisheries management is key to restoring and maintaining ecological function and benefits to people, but it requires accurate information about patterns of resource use, particularly fishing pressure. In most coral reef fisheries and other data-poor contexts, obtaining such information is challenging and remains an impediment to effective management. We developed the most comprehensive regional view of shore-based fishing effort and catch published to date, to show detailed fishing patterns from across the main Hawaiian Islands (MHI). We reveal these regional patterns through fisher "creel" surveys conducted by local communities, state agencies, academics, and/or environmental organizations, at 18 sites, comprising >10,000 h of monitoring across a range of habitats and human influences throughout the MHI. All creel surveys included in this study except for one were previously published in some form (peer-reviewed articles or gray literature reports). Here, we synthesize these studies to document spatial patterns in nearshore fisheries catch, effort, catch rates (i.e., catch-per-unit-effort (CPUE)), and catch disposition (i.e., use of fish after catch is landed). This effort provides for a description of general regional patterns based on these location-specific studies. Line fishing was by far the dominant gear type employed. The most efficient gear (i.e., highest CPUE) was spear (0.64 kg h

Indexed as

Catch-per-unit-effortCommunity-based fisheriesCoral reef fisheriesCreel surveysHawai‘i

Identifiers

PMID29226033
PMCPMC5719965

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.