Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29225968›Full record

ArticleJournal of nutrition and metabolism2017

Metabolic Differences between Dogs of Different Body Sizes.

Rondo P Middleton, Sebastien Lacroix, Marie-Pier Scott-Boyer, Nikola Dordevic, Adam D Kennedy, Amanda R Slusky, Jerome Carayol, Christina Petzinger-Germain, Alison Beloshapka, Jim Kaput

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of nutrition and metabolism, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Dogs and humans share biomarkers of mortality.The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Understanding the diversity and roles of the canine gut microbiome.Journal of animal science and biotechnology · 2025
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Purebred dogs show higher levels of genomic damage compared to mixed breed dogs.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2024
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Characteristics of Nutrition and Metabolism in Dogs and Cats.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Rondo P MiddletonNestlé Purina Research, St. Louis, MO, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5124-6703
Sebastien LacroixThe Microsoft Research, University of Trento Centre for Computational and Systems Biology (COSBI), Rovereto, Italy.
Marie-Pier Scott-BoyerThe Microsoft Research, University of Trento Centre for Computational and Systems Biology (COSBI), Rovereto, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2626-4584
Nikola DordevicThe Microsoft Research, University of Trento Centre for Computational and Systems Biology (COSBI), Rovereto, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2564-5636
Adam D KennedyMetabolon, Inc., Morrisville, NC, USA.
Amanda R SluskyNorth Carolina State University, College of Veterinary Medicine, Raleigh, NC, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2425-3232
Jerome CarayolNestlé Institute of Health Sciences, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-0049-0244
Christina Petzinger-GermainNestlé Purina Research, St. Louis, MO, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5886-1055
Alison BeloshapkaNestlé Purina Research, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Jim KaputNestlé Institute of Health Sciences, Lausanne, Switzerland.
University of Trento · ITNestlé (Switzerland) · CHMetabolon (United States) · USNorth Carolina State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe domesticated dog,

objectivesThis study aims to identify metabolic, clinical, and microbiota differences between small and larger dogs.

methodsGas chromatography/mass spectrometry, liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry, clinical chemistry analysis, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, and 16S pyrosequencing were used to characterize blood metabolic, clinical, and fecal microbiome systems, respectively. Eighty-three canines from seven different breeds, fed the same kibble diet for 5 weeks, were used in the study.

results449 metabolites, 16 clinical parameters, and 6 bacteria (at the genus level) were significantly different between small and larger dogs. Hierarchical clustering of the metabolites yielded 8 modules associated with small dog size.

conclusionSmall dogs had a lower antioxidant status and differences in circulating amino acids. Some of the amino acid differences could be attributed to differences in microflora. Additionally, analysis of small dog metabolites and clinical parameters reflected a network which strongly associates with kidney function.

Identifiers

PMID29225968
PMCPMC5684564
OpenAlexW2765328295

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.