Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29225927›Full record

ReviewBMJ global health2017

Institutionalising health technology assessment: establishing the Medical Technology Assessment Board in India.

Laura E Downey, Abha Mehndiratta, Ashoo Grover, Vijay Gauba, Kabir Sheikh, Shankar Prinja, Ravinder Singh, Francoise A Cluzeau, Saudamini Dabak, Yot Teerawattananon and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMJ global health, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Regulatory and HTA framework for herbal medicines in Indonesia.Journal of pharmaceutical policy and practice · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. A systematic assessment of the demand for HTA hub services in Asia.International journal of technology assessment in health care · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Laura E DowneyGlobal Health and Development, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Abha MehndirattaGlobal Health and Development, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Ashoo GroverIndian Council of Medical Research, New Delhi, Delhi, India.
Vijay GaubaDepartment of Health Research, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, New Delhi, Delhi, India.
Kabir SheikhPublic Health Foundation of India, New Delhi, Delhi, India.
Shankar PrinjaPGIMER, Chandigarh, Punjab, India.
Ravinder SinghIndian Council of Medical Research, New Delhi, Delhi, India.
Francoise A CluzeauGlobal Health and Development, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Saudamini DabakHealth Intervention and Technology Assessment Program, Nonthaburi, Thailand.
Yot TeerawattananonHealth Intervention and Technology Assessment Program, Nonthaburi, Thailand.
Sanjiv KumarNational Health Systems Resource Centre, Delhi, India.
Soumya SwaminathanIndian Council of Medical Research, New Delhi, Delhi, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

India is at crossroads with a commitment by the government to universal health coverage (UHC), driving efficiency and tackling waste across the public healthcare sector. Health technology assessment (HTA) is an important policy reform that can assist policy-makers to tackle inequities and inefficiencies by improving the way in which health resources are allocated towards cost-effective, appropriate and feasible interventions. The equitable and efficient distribution of health budget resources, as well as timely uptake of good value technologies, are critical to strengthen the Indian healthcare system. The government of India is set to establish a Medical Technology Assessment Board to evaluate existing and new health technologies in India, assist choices between comparable technologies for adoption by the healthcare system and improve the way in which priorities for health are set. This initiative aims to introduce a more transparent, inclusive, fair and evidence-based process by which decisions regarding the allocation of health resources are made in India towards the ultimate goal of UHC. In this analysis article, we report on plans and progress of the government of India for the institutionalisation of HTA in the country. Where India is home to one-sixth of the global population, improving the health services that the population receives will have a resounding impact not only for India but also for global health.

Indexed as

Health economicsHealth policyHealth systems evaluation

Identifiers

PMID29225927
PMCPMC5717947

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.