Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29225718›Full record

ArticlePhytochemistry letters2017

Strategies for dereplication of natural compounds using high-resolution tandem mass spectrometry.

Tobias Kind, Oliver Fiehn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Phytochemistry letters, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Tobias KindWest Coast Metabolomics Center, UC Davis, Davis 95616, California, U.S.A.
Oliver FiehnWest Coast Metabolomics Center, UC Davis, Davis 95616, California, U.S.A.

Funding

West Coast Central Comprehensive Metabolomics Resource Core (WC3MRC)U24DK097154 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI FIEHN, OLIVER · 2012 to 2017
$9.9M
Genomewide Association Study of Lipid Response to Fenofibrate and Dietary FatR01HL091357 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI ARNETT, DONNA K · 2008 to 2018
$5.8M
Functional Cardio-MetabolomicsP20HL113452 · NHLBI · CLEVELAND CLINIC LERNER COM-CWRU · PI HAZEN, STANLEY L, TANG, WAI HONG WILSON · 2012 to 2016
$4.8M
NHLBI NIH HHS P20 HL113452NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL091357NIDDK NIH HHS U24 DK097154
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Complete structural elucidation of natural products is commonly performed by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (NMR), but annotating compounds to most likely structures using high-resolution tandem mass spectrometry is a faster and feasible first step. The CASMI contest 2016 (Critical Assessment of Small Molecule Identification) provided spectra of eighteen compounds for the best manual structure identification in the natural products category. High resolution precursor and tandem mass spectra (MS/MS) were available to characterize the compounds. We used the Seven Golden Rules, Sirius2 and MS-FINDER software for determination of molecular formulas, and then we queried the formulas in different natural product databases including DNP, UNPD, ChemSpider and REAXYS to obtain molecular structures. We used different in-silico fragmentation tools including CFM-ID, CSI:FingerID and MS-FINDER to rank these compounds. Additional neutral losses and product ion peaks were manually investigated. This manual and time consuming approach allowed for the correct dereplication of thirteen of the eighteen natural products.

Indexed as

dereplicationMS-FINDERNatural productsSeven Golden Rulestandem mass spectra

Identifiers

PMID29225718
PMCPMC5720153

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.