ArticleSocial and personality psychology compass2017
Self-Regulation Principles Underlying Risk Perception and Decision Making within the Context of Genomic Testing.
Article in Social and personality psychology compass, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Representations of cancer recurrence risk, recurrence worry, and health-protective behaviours: an elaborated, systematic review.Health psychology review · 2019Pooled it
- A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials to Assess Outcomes of Genetic Counseling.Journal of genetic counseling · 2017Pooled it
- The impact of supplementing traditional risk information with polygenic risk score concerning type 2 diabetes and coronary heart disease on health behavior: a randomized controlled trial.Journal of community genetics · 2025Article
- Developing a narrative communication intervention in the context of HPV vaccination.PEC innovation · 2024Article
- Bedtime procrastination related to loneliness among Chinese university students during post-pandemic period: a moderated chain mediation model.BMC public health · 2024Article
- Ethical, legal, and social implications (ELSI) and challenges in the design of a randomized controlled trial to test the online return of cancer genetic research results to U.S. Black women.Contemporary clinical trials · 2023Article
- Toward a theoretical understanding of young female cancer survivors' decision-making about family-building post-treatment.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2020Article
- A primer in genomics for social and behavioral investigators.Translational behavioral medicine · 2020Article
- Genetic test reporting of CDKN2A provides informational and motivational benefits for managing melanoma risk.Translational behavioral medicine · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Advances in theory and research on self-regulation and decision-making processes have yielded important insights into how cognitive, emotional, and social processes shape risk perceptions and risk-related decisions. We examine how self-regulation theory can be applied to inform our understanding of decision-making processes within the context of genomic testing, a clinical arena in which individuals face complex risk information and potentially life-altering decisions. After presenting key principles of self-regulation, we present a genomic testing case example to illustrate how principles related to risk representations, approach and avoidance motivations, emotion regulation, defensive responses, temporal construals, and capacities such as numeric abilities can shape decisions and psychological responses during the genomic testing process. We conclude with implications for using self-regulation theory to advance science within genomic testing and opportunities for how this research can inform further developments in self-regulation theory.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.