Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29225618›Full record

ArticleGastroenterology research and practice2017

Influence of Enhanced Recovery Pathway on Surgical Site Infection after Colonic Surgery.

Caroline Gronnier, Fabian Grass, Christiane Petignat, Basile Pache, Dieter Hahnloser, Giorgio Zanetti, Nicolas Demartines, Martin Hübner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gastroenterology research and practice, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Observational
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Caroline GronnierDepartment of Visceral Surgery, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland.
Fabian GrassDepartment of Visceral Surgery, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-9884-2879
Christiane PetignatDepartment of Hospital Preventive Medicine, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland.
Basile PacheDepartment of Visceral Surgery, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland.
Dieter HahnloserDepartment of Visceral Surgery, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland.
Giorgio ZanettiDepartment of Hospital Preventive Medicine, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland.
Nicolas DemartinesDepartment of Visceral Surgery, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-1530-3114
Martin HübnerDepartment of Visceral Surgery, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-4521-8279

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe present study aimed to evaluate a potential effect of ERAS on surgical site infections (SSI).

methodsColonic surgical patients operated between May 2011 and September 2015 constituted the cohort for this retrospective analysis. Over 100 items related to demographics, surgical details, compliance, and outcome were retrieved from a prospectively maintained database. SSI were traced by an independent National surveillance program. Risk factors for SSI were identified by univariate and multinomial logistic regression.

resultsFifty-four out of 397 patients (14%) developed SSI. Independent risk factors for SSI were emergency surgery (OR 1.56; 95% CI 1.09-1.78,

conclusionsSmoking, open and emergency surgery, and bowel preparation were risk factors for SSI. ERAS pathway had no independent impact while minimally invasive approach did. This study was registered under ResearchRegistry.com (UIN researchregistry2614).

Identifiers

PMID29225618
PMCPMC5684545

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.