Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29225615›Full record

ArticleComputational intelligence and neuroscience2017

Epileptic Seizure Prediction Using CSP and LDA for Scalp EEG Signals.

Turky N Alotaiby, Saleh A Alshebeili, Faisal M Alotaibi, Saud R Alrshoud

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Computational intelligence and neuroscience, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Combining temporal and spatial attention for seizure prediction.Health information science and systems · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Epilepsy Seizures Prediction Based on Nonlinear Features of EEG Signal and Gradient Boosting Decision Tree.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Turky N AlotaibyKACST, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-0924-1746
Saleh A AlshebeiliKACST-TIC in Radio Frequency and Photonics for the e-Society (RFTONICS), Electrical Engineering Department, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Faisal M AlotaibiKACST, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Saud R AlrshoudKACST, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper presents a patient-specific epileptic seizure predication method relying on the common spatial pattern- (CSP-) based feature extraction of scalp electroencephalogram (sEEG) signals. Multichannel EEG signals are traced and segmented into overlapping segments for both preictal and interictal intervals. The features extracted using CSP are used for training a linear discriminant analysis classifier, which is then employed in the testing phase. A leave-one-out cross-validation strategy is adopted in the experiments. The experimental results for seizure prediction obtained from the records of 24 patients from the CHB-MIT database reveal that the proposed predictor can achieve an average sensitivity of 0.89, an average false prediction rate of 0.39, and an average prediction time of 68.71 minutes using a 120-minute prediction horizon.

Indexed as

ElectroencephalographyAdolescentBrainChildChild, PreschoolDiagnosis, Computer-AssistedDiscriminant AnalysisEpilepsyFalse Positive ReactionsFemaleHumansInfantLinear ModelsMalePrognosisScalp

Identifiers

PMID29225615
PMCPMC5684608

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.