Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29225407›Full record

ArticleCommunications in statistics: Simulation and computation2017

Assessing type I error and power of multistate Markov models for panel data-A simulation study.

Christy Cassarly, Renee' H Martin, Marc Chimowitz, Edsel A Peña, Viswanathan Ramakrishnan, Yuko Y Palesch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications in statistics: Simulation and computation, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Christy CassarlyDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC.
Renee' H MartinDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC.
Marc ChimowitzDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC.
Edsel A PeñaDepartment of Statistics, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC.
Viswanathan RamakrishnanDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC.
Yuko Y PaleschDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC.

Funding

Statistical and Data Coordinating Center for the ATACH - 2U01NS061861 · NINDS · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI PALESCH, YUKO Y · 2010 to 2014
$2.2M
NINDS NIH HHS U01 NS061861
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ordinal outcomes collected at multiple follow-up visits are common in clinical trials. Sometimes, one visit is chosen for the primary analysis and the scale is dichotomized amounting to loss of information. Multistate Markov models describe how a process moves between states over time. Here, simulation studies are performed to investigate the type I error and power characteristics of multistate Markov models for panel data with limited non-adjacent state transitions. The results suggest that the multistate Markov models preserve the type I error and adequate power is achieved with modest sample sizes for panel data with limited non-adjacent state transitions.

Indexed as

Multistate modelspanel datapowerstroketype I error

Identifiers

PMID29225407
PMCPMC5722228

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.