ArticleCurrent biology : CB2017
Origins and Specification of the Drosophila Wing.
Article in Current biology : CB, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- HIF-1α-mediated feedback prevents TOR signalling from depleting oxygen supply and triggering stress during normal development.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Canonical Wnt signalling from the area opaca induces and maintains the marginal zone in pre-primitive-streak stage chick embryos.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2025Article
- The Enigmas of Tissue Closure: Inspiration fromCurrent issues in molecular biology · 2024Review
- The meaning of ubiquitylation of the DSL ligand Delta for the development of Drosophila.BMC biology · 2023Article
- Mechanical constraints to cell-cycle progression in a pseudostratified epithelium.Current biology : CB · 2022Article
- Article
- The wing imaginal disc.Genetics · 2022Article
- Single-cell transcriptomics of theeLife · 2021Article
- A unified mechanism for the control of Drosophila wing growth by the morphogens Decapentaplegic and Wingless.PLoS biology · 2021Article
- Wing serial homologues and the diversification of insect outgrowths: insights from the pupae of scarab beetles.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2021Article
- Role of the Forkhead Transcription Factors Fd4 and Fd5 DuringFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021Article
- Knockout of crustacean leg patterning genes suggests that insect wings and body walls evolved from ancient leg segments.Nature ecology & evolution · 2020Article
- Two sets of candidate crustacean wing homologues and their implication for the origin of insect wings.Nature ecology & evolution · 2020Article
- Evolutionary origin and functioning of pregenital abdominal outgrowths in a viviparous insect, Arixenia esau.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Article
- Specification and Patterning ofJournal of developmental biology · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The insect wing is a key evolutionary innovation that was essential for insect diversification. Yet despite its importance, there is still debate about its evolutionary origins. Two main hypotheses have been proposed: the paranotal hypothesis, which suggests that wings evolved as an extension of the dorsal thorax, and the gill-exite hypothesis, which proposes that wings were derived from a modification of a pre-existing branch at the dorsal base (subcoxa) of the leg. Here, we address this question by studying how wing fates are initially specified during Drosophila embryogenesis, by characterizing a cis-regulatory module (CRM) from the snail (sna) gene, sna-DP (for dorsal primordia). sna-DP specifically marks the early primordia for both the wing and haltere, collectively referred to as the DP. We found that the inputs that activate sna-DP are distinct from those that activate Distalless, a marker for leg fates. Further, in genetic backgrounds in which the leg primordia are absent, the DP are still partially specified. However, lineage-tracing experiments demonstrate that cells from the early leg primordia contribute to both ventral and dorsal appendage fates. Together, these results suggest that the wings of Drosophila have a dual developmental origin: two groups of cells, one ventral and one more dorsal, give rise to the mature wing. We suggest that the dual developmental origins of the wing may be a molecular remnant of the evolutionary history of this appendage, in which cells of the subcoxa of the leg coalesced with dorsal outgrowths to evolve a dorsal appendage with motor control.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.