SynthesisAmerican heart journal2018
Global geographical variation in patient characteristics in percutaneous coronary intervention clinical trials: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in American heart journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Geographical variations in left main coronary artery revascularisation: a prespecified analysis of the EXCEL trial.EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2022Trial
- Left atrial appendage occlusion: trends in demographics and in-hospital outcomes-a German nationwide analysis.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2026Observational
- Sex-Based Outcomes in Patients With High Bleeding Risk After PCI With 1-Month DAPT: Results From the Onyx ONE Clear Study.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions · 2026Article
- Beyond Conventional Meta-Analysis: A Meta-Learning Model to Predict Cohort-Level Mortality After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR).Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2025Review
- Outcomes of Complex Percutaneous Cardiac Interventions in Women.US cardiology · 2023Review
- Reframing implementation science to address inequities in healthcare delivery.BMC health services research · 2020Article
- Percutaneous coronary intervention procedures performed at a hospital in Southern Brazil.American journal of cardiovascular disease · 2020Article
- Geographic Variations on the Safety and Efficacy of the Supreme Biodegradable Polymer DES: Results From PIONEER III.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & InterventionsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundWe sought to determine whether there are differences in enrolled patients' risk factors in published percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) trials between various continents.
methodsWe systematically identified clinical trials evaluating PCI interventions through PubMed. We reviewed 701 studies between 1990 and 2014 from North America (N=135), Europe (N=403), and Asia (N=163), examining the prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors-hypertension (HTN), diabetes mellitus (DM), hyperlipidemia (HL), smoking, sex, and body mass index. We performed meta-regression with random- and mixed-effects models to compare patient baseline characteristics between continents and linear meta-regression analysis to test trends over time.
resultsIn meta-regression with random-effects model, North American trials recruited the lowest proportion of male participants (71.32%), followed by Asian (74.41%) and European trials (76.47%; P<.0001). North American trials enrolled the highest proportion of patients with HTN (63.17%, P=.0035) and HL (63.72%, P<.0001), whereas Asia enrolled the highest proportion of DM patients (29.64%, P<.0001) and smoking (38.41%, P=.0144). When adjusting for other moderators such as publication date, body mass index, and sex in meta-regression with mixed-effects model, age was significantly positively correlated with HTN, HL, DM, and smoking (P<.001). Body mass index was significantly higher in Europe and North America than in Asia. All enrollment risk factors demonstrated (β<0.02) statistically significant temporal trends over time, except for sex.
conclusionsThere are major continental differences in risk factors among patients enrolled in PCI trials from various continents. Clinical trial results may not be applicable to patient populations from another region.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.