Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29224571›Full record

ArticleBMC palliative care2017

'Worried to death': the assessment and management of anxiety in patients with advanced life-limiting disease, a national survey of palliative medicine physicians.

N Atkin, V Vickerstaff, B Candy

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC palliative care, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 102 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Observational
  8. Multimorbidity Management: A Scoping Review of Interventions and Health Outcomes.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. The Level of COVID-19 Anxiety among Oncology Patients in Poland.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

N AtkinCamden, Islington ELiPSe and UCLH & HCA Palliative Care Service, London, UK.
V VickerstaffMarie Curie Palliative Care Research Department (MCPCRD), Division of Psychiatry, University College London, 6th Floor Wing B, Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London, W1T 7NF, UK. v.vickerstaff@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3119-670X
B CandyMarie Curie Palliative Care Research Department (MCPCRD), Division of Psychiatry, University College London, 6th Floor Wing B, Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London, W1T 7NF, UK.
University College London · GBCamden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

Marie Curie 531477Marie Curie MCCC-FCO-11-UMarie Curie MCCC-FPO-16-U
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAnxiety adversely affects quality of life and is common in adults with advanced life-limiting disease. There are no UK-wide guidelines on the assessment and management of anxiety in this specific population and there is little evidence regarding drug treatments. This study aimed to explore how palliative care physicians assess and manage anxiety in their patients, and to identify barriers encountered.

methodsA cross-sectional survey was undertaken of all physicians working in specialist palliative care in the UK who were members of the Association for Palliative Medicine. This was conducted in February 2014 using an online questionnaire.

resultsThe response rate was 23% (230/980) and 61% of respondents were consultants. Most did not use tools to screen for anxiety (87%) and almost all used the clinical interview to diagnose anxiety (99%). Only 8% used psychiatric criteria. Most physicians reported difficulties managing anxiety (93%). Only 33% thought they had adequate training in this area. Most had difficulty accessing psychological and/or psychiatric services (71%, 64% respectively). The majority used a combination of pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments for anxiety. The most frequently prescribed first-line medications for patients with a prognosis of days to weeks were benzodiazepines (93%), usually lorazepam. The use of benzodiazepines over antidepressants was statistically significant (p < 0.001). For patients with a prognosis of months, antidepressants were most frequently prescribed first-line (60%), significantly more than benzodiazepines (p < 0.001). However, benzodiazepine use was still common in this prognostic group with 47% prescribing it first-line, sometimes in combination with an antidepressant.

conclusionThis is the first national survey on the assessment and management of anxiety in palliative care. Findings demonstrate the infrequent use of screening tools, variation in prescribing practice, potentially inappropriate use of benzodiazepines for patients with a prognosis of months, training gaps and poor access to psychological and psychiatric services in the UK. This highlights the need for formal training, further research into the pharmacological management of anxiety in this population and evidence-based national guidance to support clinical decision-making and service development.

Indexed as

Palliative CareAdultAnxietyCross-Sectional StudiesDisease ManagementFemaleHumansMaleMass ScreeningMiddle AgedPhysiciansPractice Patterns, Physicians'Surveys and QuestionnairesUnited KingdomWorkforceAnxietyHealth care surveysPalliative carePhysicians

Identifiers

PMID29224571
PMCPMC5724241
OpenAlexW2773411590

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.