ArticleCurrent medical research and opinion2018
Effect of ruxolitinib therapy on the quality-of-life of Japanese patients with myelofibrosis.
Article in Current medical research and opinion, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Multi-national Open-label Phase II Study of the JAK Inhibitor INC424 in Patients With Primary Myelofibrosis, Post-polycythemia Vera Myelofibrosis or Post-essential Thrombocythemia Myelofibrosis
A Multicenter, Open-label Clinical Study of the JAK Inhibitor Ruxolitinib (INC424) in Patients With Primary Myelofibrosis, Post-polycythemia Vera Myelofibrosis, or Post-essential Thrombocythemia Myelofibrosis
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Momelotinib versus ruxolitinib in JAK inhibitor-naïve patients with myelofibrosis: an efficacy/safety analysis in the Japanese subgroup of the phase 3 randomized SIMPLIFY-1 trial.International journal of hematology · 2024Trial
- Effects of Ruxolitinib and Calcitriol Combination Treatment on Various Molecular Subtypes of Breast Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Efficacy and safety of ruxolitinib in patients with myelofibrosis: a retrospective and multicenter experience in TurkeyTurkish journal of medical sciences · 2021Article
- Janus kinase inhibition and symptom control in myeloproliferative neoplasms.Current medical research and opinion · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
15 authors at 13 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesMyelofibrosis (MF) is associated with a significant symptom burden that severely impacts patient quality-of-life (QoL). Ruxolitinib, a potent Janus kinase 1 (JAK1)/JAK2 inhibitor, led to substantial improvements in splenomegaly, MF-associated symptoms, and QoL in the phase 3 COMFORT studies, proving superior to placebo and best available therapy. This study evaluated the effect of ruxolitinib on symptoms and QoL in Japanese patients with MF.
methodsA pooled analysis of studies A2202 (NCT01392443) and AJP01 (NCT02087059) of ruxolitinib in Japanese patients with MF (n = 81) was conducted. Changes in total symptom score (TSS) and the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 were summarized.
resultsMost patients received a starting dose of 15 or 20 mg twice daily (BID) and had a final titrated dose of ≥10 mg BID. Overall, 67.7% (44/65) achieved a ≥50% reduction from baseline in TSS at week 24. Reductions in TSS were seen in every dose group; the greatest reductions occurred in patients with a final titrated dose of 20 or 25 mg BID. Improvements in QoL were seen in patients who achieved a ≥50% reduction in TSS. Generally, improvements in TSS and individual symptoms correlated with reductions in spleen size, with those having a ≥35% reduction in spleen volume having the greatest improvements.
conclusionsConsistent with COMFORT-I, ruxolitinib provided substantial improvements in symptoms and QoL in Japanese patients with MF, with higher doses of ruxolitinib associated with better responses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.