Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29223771›Full record

ReviewNeuroscience and biobehavioral reviews2018

Comparative studies of social buffering: A consideration of approaches, terminology, and pitfalls.

Yasushi Kiyokawa, Michael B Hennessy

Abstract readComparative StudyReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 64 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
64citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

64 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Social Buffering of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: Longitudinal Effects and Neural Mediators.Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

4 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yasushi KiyokawaLaboratory of Veterinary Ethology, The University of Tokyo, 1-1-1 Yayoi, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8657, Japan. Electronic address: akiyo@mail.ecc.u-tokyo.ac.jp.
Michael B HennessyDepartment of Psychology, Wright State University, 335 Fawcett Hall, Dayton, OH, 45435, United States. Electronic address: michael.hennessy@wright.edu.

Funding

STRESS-INDUCED SICKNESS SOCIAL SEPARATION: DEPRESSIONR15MH068228 · NIMH · WRIGHT STATE UNIVERSITY · PI HENNESSY, MICHAEL B · 2003 to 2013
$1.0M
NIMH NIH HHS R15 MH068228
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

KIYOKAWA, Y. and HENNESSY, M.B. Comparative studies of social buffering: A consideration of approaches, terminology, and pitfalls…NEUROSCI BIOBEHAV REV XXX-XXX, .- Over the past decades, there has been an increasing number of investigations of the impact of social variables on neural, endocrine, and immune outcomes. Among these are studies of "social buffering"-or the phenomenon by which affiliative social partners mitigate the response to stressors. Yet, as social buffering studies have become more commonplace, the variety of approaches taken, definitions employed, and divergent results obtained in different species can lead to confusion and miscommunication. The aim of the present paper, therefore, is to address terminology and approaches and to highlight potential pitfalls to the study of social buffering across nonhuman species. We review and categorize variables currently being employed in social buffering studies and provide an overview of responses measured, mediating sensory modalities and underlying mechanisms. It is our hope that the paper will be useful to those contemplating examination of social buffering in the context of their own research.

Indexed as

Social BehaviorAnimalsObject AttachmentStress, PsychologicalTerminology as TopicAffiliationAttachmentBondingMaternal bufferingSocial bufferingStress

Identifiers

PMID29223771
PMCPMC5801062

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.