Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29223025›Full record

ReviewAddictive behaviors2018

The intersection between response inhibition and substance use among adolescents.

Kristine Rømer Thomsen, Tine Blom Osterland, Morten Hesse, Sarah W Feldstein Ewing

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Addictive behaviors, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kristine Rømer ThomsenCenter for Alcohol and Drug Research, Department of Psychology and Behavioural Sciences, Aarhus University, Bartholins Allé 10, 8000 Aarhus C, Denmark. Electronic address: krt.crf@psy.au.dk.
Tine Blom OsterlandDepartment of Psychology and Behavioural Sciences, Aarhus University, Bartholins Allé 9, 8000 Aarhus C, Denmark.
Morten HesseCenter for Alcohol and Drug Research, Department of Psychology and Behavioural Sciences, Aarhus University, Bartholins Allé 10, 8000 Aarhus C, Denmark.
Sarah W Feldstein EwingDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Oregon Health and Science University, Mail Code: DC7, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Rd, Portland, OR 97239-3098, USA.

Funding

fMRI and Treatment Response with Binge Drinking AdolescentsR01AA023658 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF RHODE ISLAND · PI FELDSTEIN EWING, SARAH W. · 2015 to 2019
$1.7M
Deriving a de novo adolescent addiction treatment from developmental brain dataK24AA026876 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF RHODE ISLAND · PI Sarah W. Feldstein Ewing · 2018 to 2026
$1.3M
NIAAA NIH HHS K24 AA026876NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA023658
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Problems related to the capacity to successfully engage response inhibition are considered a risk factor for the development of substance use disorders (SUDs), but the evidence has been predominantly cross-sectional. In this commentary, we argue that recent longitudinal studies with multi-modal measures of response inhibition can improve understanding of how response inhibition may intersect with substance use among adolescents. Most Stop-Signal studies suggest that slower response inhibition predicts substance use progressions, with one multi-site study showing greater fronto-parietal activity indicative of risk. Most Go-NoGo studies suggest that blunted activation of prefrontal cortical areas during response inhibition predicts substance use progressions, while commission errors are less effective in identifying adolescents at risk. Studies differ in subject populations, outcome measures, statistical methods, and BOLD response contrasts, which challenge the capacity to compare and generalize findings. We encourage research teams throughout the globe to undertake multi-modal, longitudinal studies to assess brain functioning with large sample sizes, and when possible, before significant substance use potentially obscures interpretation of findings. Systematic review and meta-analysis of this growing literature are also important goals for future research.

Indexed as

Inhibition, PsychologicalAdolescentFrontal LobeHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeuropsychological TestsParietal LobePrefrontal CortexRefractory Period, PsychologicalSubstance-Related DisordersAdolescentsfMRILongitudinalResponse inhibitionRisk factorsSubstance use

Identifiers

PMID29223025
PMCPMC5783760

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.