Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29222917›Full record

ArticleHepatology (Baltimore, Md.)2018

Diagnostic modalities for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, nonalcoholic steatohepatitis, and associated fibrosis.

Zobair M Younossi, Rohit Loomba, Quentin M Anstee, Mary E Rinella, Elisabetta Bugianesi, Giulio Marchesini, Brent A Neuschwander-Tetri, Lawrence Serfaty, Francesco Negro, Stephen H Caldwell and 14 more

Abstract readConference Proceedings
In one paragraph

Article in Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 209 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
209citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

209 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Guideline
  5. Effect of Probiotics Therapy on Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2022
    Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

149 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors.

Zobair M YounossiDepartment of Medicine and Betty and Guy Beatty Center for Integrated Research, Claude Moore, Inova Health Systems, Falls Church, VA.ORCID 0000-0001-9313-577X
Rohit LoombaNAFLD Research Center, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, CA.
Quentin M AnsteeNorthwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL.
Mary E RinellaUniversity of Torino, Department of Medical Sciences, Torino, Italy.
Elisabetta BugianesiUniversità di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Giulio MarchesiniDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, MO.
Brent A Neuschwander-TetriSaint-Antoine Hospital, Paris, France.
Lawrence SerfatyUniversity Hospitals of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Francesco NegroDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA.
Stephen H CaldwellInstitute of Cardiometabolim and Nutrition (ICAN) and Hospital Pitié Salpêtrière, de L'Hopital, Paris, France.
Vlad RatziuMassachusetts General Hospital, Cambridge, MA.
Kathleen E CoreyIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Division of Liver Diseases, New York, NY.
Scott L FriedmanDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Duke University, Durham, NC.
Manal F AbdelmalekPinnacle Clinical Research, San Antonio, TX.
Stephen A HarrisonDivision of Gastroenterology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA.
Arun J SanyalDepartment of Pediatrics, Columbia College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY.
Joel E LavineHôpital Claude Huriez Rue Michel Polonowski, Lille, France.
Philippe MathurinDepartment of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL.
Michael R CharltonDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN.
Zachary D GoodmanDepartment of Medicine and Betty and Guy Beatty Center for Integrated Research, Claude Moore, Inova Health Systems, Falls Church, VA.
Naga P ChalasaniInstitute of Cellular Medicine, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
Kris V KowdleySwedish Medical Center, Seattle, WA.
Jacob GeorgeStorr Liver Centre, Westmead Institute for Medical Research, Westmead Hospital and University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Keith LindorArizona State University.

Funding

The Role of KLF6 in Hepatic FibrosisR01DK056621 · NIDDK · MOUNT SINAI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE OF NYU · PI FRIEDMAN, SCOTT L. · 2000 to 2019
$6.2M
Project 2P20AA017067 · NIAAA · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI FRIEDMAN, SCOTT L. · 2008 to 2012
$2.5M
Autophagy during hepatic stellate cell activation in alcoholic liver injuryR01AA020709 · NIAAA · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI FRIEDMAN, SCOTT L. · 2011 to 2015
$1.8M
Hepatic autophagy, progenitor cells and fibrosisR56DK056621 · NIDDK · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI FRIEDMAN, SCOTT L. · 2015 to 2015
$297k
NIAAA NIH HHS P20 AA017067NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA020709NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK056621NIDDK NIH HHS R56 DK056621
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is a spectrum comprised of isolated steatosis, nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), advanced fibrosis, and cirrhosis. The majority of NAFLD subjects do not have NASH and do not carry a significant risk for liver-related adverse outcomes (cirrhosis and mortality). Globally, the prevalence of NAFLD is approximately 25%. In Asia, a gradient of high to low prevalence rates is noted from urban to rural areas. Given the prevalence of NAFLD, the clinical and economic burden of NAFLD and NASH can be substantial. With increasing recognition of NASH as an important liver disease, the diagnosis of NASH still requires a liver biopsy that is suboptimal. Although liver biopsy is the most accurate modality to diagnose and stage the severity of NASH, this method suffers from being invasive, costly, associated with potential complications, and plagued with interobserver variability of individual pathological features. A number of noninvasive modalities to diagnose NASH and stage liver fibrosis are being developed. These modalities include predictive models (NAFLD fibrosis score) and serum biomarkers such as enhanced liver fibrosis (ELF). Other tests are based on radiological techniques, such as transient elastography (TE) or magnetic resonance elastography (MRE), which are used to estimate liver stiffness as a potential surrogate of hepatic fibrosis. Although a dynamic field of research, most of these diagnostic modalities have area under the curve ranging between 0.76 and 0.90%, with MRE having the best predictive performance. In summary, developing safe and easily accessible noninvasive modalities to accurately diagnose and monitor NASH and associated fibrosis is of utmost importance in clinical practice and clinical research. These tests are not only important to risk stratify subjects at the greatest risk for progressive liver disease, but also to serve as appropriate surrogate endpoints for therapeutic clinical trials of NASH. (Hepatology 2018;68:349-360).

Indexed as

BiomarkersCollagenHumansLiverLiver CirrhosisNon-alcoholic Fatty Liver DiseaseBiomarkersCollagen

Identifiers

PMID29222917
PMCPMC6511364

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.