Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29222738›Full record

Observational studyThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2018

CT based 3D printing is superior to transesophageal echocardiography for pre-procedure planning in left atrial appendage device closure.

Edinrin Obasare, Sumeet K Mainigi, D Lynn Morris, Leandro Slipczuk, Igor Goykhman, Evan Friend, Mary Rodriguez Ziccardi, Gregg S Pressman

Abstract readComparative StudyObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. MRI-based training model for left atrial appendage closure.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Edinrin ObasareEinstein Heart and Vascular Institute, Einstein Medical Center, 5501 Old York Road, Philadelphia, PA, 19141, USA. ObasareE@einstein.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3165-1792
Sumeet K MainigiEinstein Heart and Vascular Institute, Einstein Medical Center, 5501 Old York Road, Philadelphia, PA, 19141, USA.
D Lynn MorrisEinstein Heart and Vascular Institute, Einstein Medical Center, 5501 Old York Road, Philadelphia, PA, 19141, USA.
Leandro SlipczukEinstein Heart and Vascular Institute, Einstein Medical Center, 5501 Old York Road, Philadelphia, PA, 19141, USA.
Igor GoykhmanDepartment of Radiology, Einstein Medical Center, 5501 Old York Road, Philadelphia, PA, 19141, USA.
Evan FriendEinstein Heart and Vascular Institute, Einstein Medical Center, 5501 Old York Road, Philadelphia, PA, 19141, USA.
Mary Rodriguez ZiccardiDepartment of Internal Medicine, Einstein Medical Center, 5501 Old York Road, Philadelphia, PA, 19141, USA.
Gregg S PressmanEinstein Heart and Vascular Institute, Einstein Medical Center, 5501 Old York Road, Philadelphia, PA, 19141, USA.
Einstein Medical Center Philadelphia · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate assessment of the left atrial appendage (LAA) is important for pre-procedure planning when utilizing device closure for stroke reduction. Sizing is traditionally done with transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) but this is not always precise. Three-dimensional (3D) printing of the LAA may be more accurate. 24 patients underwent Watchman device (WD) implantation (71 ± 11 years, 42% female). All had complete 2-dimensional TEE. Fourteen also had cardiac computed tomography (CCT) with 3D printing to produce a latex model of the LAA for pre-procedure planning. Device implantation was unsuccessful in 2 cases (one with and one without a 3D model). The model correlated perfectly with implanted device size (R

Indexed as

Echocardiography, TransesophagealModels, CardiovascularMultidetector Computed TomographyPatient-Specific ModelingPrinting, Three-DimensionalAgedAged, 80 and overAtrial AppendageAtrial FibrillationCardiac CatheterizationComputer-Aided DesignFemaleHumansLatexMaleMiddle AgedLatexAtrial fibrillationLeft atrial appendageLeft atrial appendage closure deviceMulti-modality imagingThree-dimensional printing

Identifiers

PMID29222738
OpenAlexW2774366650

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.