Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29222596›Full record

Trial reportEuropean journal of applied physiology2018

The effects of local forearm muscle cooling on motor unit properties.

Matthew M Mallette, Lara A Green, David A Gabriel, Stephen S Cheung

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in European journal of applied physiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The effects of local muscle temperature on force variability.European journal of applied physiology · 2019
    Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Matthew M MalletteDepartment of Kinesiology, Brock University, 1812 Sir Isaac Brock Way, St. Catharines, Ontario, L2S 3A1, Canada. matt.mallette@brocku.ca.
Lara A GreenDepartment of Kinesiology, Brock University, 1812 Sir Isaac Brock Way, St. Catharines, Ontario, L2S 3A1, Canada.
David A GabrielDepartment of Kinesiology, Brock University, 1812 Sir Isaac Brock Way, St. Catharines, Ontario, L2S 3A1, Canada.
Stephen S CheungDepartment of Kinesiology, Brock University, 1812 Sir Isaac Brock Way, St. Catharines, Ontario, L2S 3A1, Canada.
Brock University · CA

Funding

Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada 125515658
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeMuscle cooling impairs maximal force. Using needle electromyography (EMG) to assess motor unit properties during muscle cooling, is limited and equivocal. Therefore, we aimed to determine the impact of local muscle cooling on motor unit firing properties using surface EMG decomposition.

methodsTwenty participants (12 M, 8 F) completed maximal, evoked, and trapezoidal contractions during thermoneutral and cold muscle conditions. Forearm muscle temperature was manipulated using 10-min neutral (~ 32 °C) or 20-min cold (~ 3 °C) water baths. Twitches and maximal voluntary contractions were performed prior to, and after, forearm immersion in neutral or cold water. Motor unit properties were assessed during trapezoidal contractions to 50% baseline force using surface EMG decomposition.

resultsImpaired contractile properties from muscle cooling were evident in the twitch amplitude, duration, and rate of force development indicating that the muscle was successfully cooled from the cold water bath (all d ≥ 0.5, P < 0.05). Surface EMG decomposition showed muscle cooling increased the number of motor units (d = 0.7, P = 0.01) and motor unit action potential (MUAP) duration (d = 0.6, P < 0.001), but decreased MUAP amplitude (d = 0.2, P = 0.012). Individually, neither motor unit firing rates (d = 0.1, P = 0.843) nor recruitment threshold (d = 0.1, P = 0.746) changed; however, the relationship between the recruitment threshold and motor unit firing rate was steeper (d = 1.0, P < 0.001) and had an increased y-intercept (d = 0.9, P = 0.007) with muscle cooling.

conclusionsSince muscle contractility is impaired with muscle cooling, these findings suggest a compensatory increase in the number of active motor units, and small but coupled changes in motor unit firing rates and recruitment threshold to produce the same force.

Indexed as

Recruitment, NeurophysiologicalAdultFemaleForearmHumansHypothermia, InducedIsometric ContractionMaleMuscle, SkeletalDecomposition electromyographyFlexor carpi radialisMuscle temperatureRate codingRecruitment threshold

Identifiers

PMID29222596
OpenAlexW2775048709

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.