ArticleJAMA ophthalmology2018
Incidence and Causes of Overdiagnosis of Optic Neuritis.
Article in JAMA ophthalmology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
40 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 109 citations in OpenAlex.
- Semaglutide-associated risk of nonarteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy in patients with type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.PLoS medicine · 2026 · on this mapPooled it
- Validity of International Classification of Diseases Codes for Identifying Neuro-Ophthalmic Disease in Large Data Sets: A Systematic Review.Journal of neuro-ophthalmology : the official journal of the North American Neuro-Ophthalmology Society · 2020Pooled it
- Optic Nerve Lesion Length at the Acute Phase of Optic Neuritis Is Predictive of Retinal Neuronal Loss.Neurology(R) neuroimmunology & neuroinflammation · 2022Trial
- The supporting role of Visual Evoked Potentials for the diagnosis of Optic Neuritis within the 2022 ICON criteria.Multiple sclerosis (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England) · 2026Article
- Differential diagnosis and clinical predictors in suspected optic neuritis.Japanese journal of ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Advances in ocular motor and pupil biomarkers for neurological disorders.Brain communications · 2026Review
- Evaluating the diagnostic reasoning of large language models in complex neuro-ophthalmological cases: a comparative analysis of GPT-o1 Pro, GPT-4o, Gemini, Grok 2 and DeepSeek.BMJ open ophthalmology · 2025Article
- Isolated Optic Neuritis: Etiology, Characteristics, and Outcomes in a US Mountain West Cohort.Journal of neuro-ophthalmology : the official journal of the North American Neuro-Ophthalmology Society · 2025Article
- New optical coherence tomography biomarker for diagnosis of acute optic neuritis in multiple sclerosis.Heliyon · 2025Article
- Trends in utilization of imaging among ophthalmic-related emergency department visits in the United States.Frontiers in ophthalmology · 2025Article
- Visual outcomes in a series of patients with papilledema and comorbid nutritional deficiency.Frontiers in ophthalmology · 2025Article
- Misdiagnosis of Multiple Sclerosis: Past, Present, and Future.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2024Review
- Application of the international criteria for optic neuritis in the Acute Optic Neuritis Network.Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2024Observational
- Value of Optic Nerve MRI in Multiple Sclerosis Clinical Management: A MAGNIMS Position Paper and Future Perspectives.Neurology · 2024Review
- How far should I manage acute optic neuritis as an ophthalmologist? A United Kingdom perspective.Eye (London, England) · 2024Review
- Applying the 2022 optic neuritis criteria to noninflammatory optic neuropathies with optic nerve T2-hyperintensity: an observational study.Journal of neurology · 2024Observational
- Article
- Adding the Optic Nerve in Multiple Sclerosis Diagnostic Criteria: A Longitudinal, Prospective, Multicenter StudyNeurology · 2024Article
- Myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-associated disease (MOGAD): current understanding and challenges.Journal of neurology · 2023Review
- Deep learning system for distinguishing optic neuritis from non-arteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy at acute phase based on fundus photographs.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: Diagnostic error is an important source of medical error. Overdiagnosis of optic neuritis may prompt unnecessary and costly diagnostic tests, procedures, and treatments. Objective: To assess the incidence of and characterize factors contributing to overdiagnosis of acute optic neuritis. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this retrospective clinic-based cross-sectional study of new patient encounters, 122 patients referred for acute optic neuritis at a university-based Midwestern neuro-ophthalmology clinic between January 2014 and October 2016 were studied. Data were analyzed from September 2016 to July 2017. Interventions: Definite diagnosis was determined by neuro-ophthalmologists. For patients with alterative diagnoses, the Diagnosis Error Evaluation and Research taxonomy tool was applied to categorize the type of diagnostic error. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the primary type of diagnostic error in patients erroneously diagnosed as having optic neuritis. Secondary outcomes included final diagnosis and interventions undergone prior to referral. Results: A total of 122 patients were referred with acute optic neuritis during the study period; 88 (72.1%) were female, and the mean (SD) age was 42.6 (14.0) years. Of these, 49 patients (40.2%; 95% CI, 31.4-49.4) were confirmed to have optic neuritis, and 73 (59.8%; 95% CI, 50.6-68.6) had an alternative diagnosis. The most common alternative diagnoses were headache and eye pain, functional visual loss, and other optic neuropathies, particularly nonarteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy. The most common diagnostic error was eliciting or interpreting critical elements of history, which occurred in 24 of 73 patients (33%) with alternative diagnoses. Other common errors included errors weighing or considering alternative diagnoses (23 patients [32%]), errors weighing or interpreting physical examination findings (15 patients [21%]), and misinterpreting diagnostic test results (11 patients [15%]). In patients with alterative diagnoses, 12 (16%) had normal magnetic resonance imaging findings preceding the referral, 12 (16%) had received a lumbar puncture, and 8 (11%) had received unnecessary treatment with intravenous steroids. Conclusions and Relevance: These data suggest that nearly 60% (95% CI, 50.6-68.6) of patients referred for optic neuritis have an alternative diagnosis, with the most common errors being overreliance on a single item of history and failure to consider alternative diagnoses. Understanding pitfalls leading to overdiagnosis of optic neuritis may improve clinicians' diagnostic process.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.