Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29222526›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

Numerical value biases sound localization.

Edward J Golob, Jörg Lewald, Stephan Getzmann, Jeffrey R Mock

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Front-back asymmetries in endogenous auditory spatial attention.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Edward J GolobDepartment of Psychology, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA, USA. edward.golob@utsa.edu.
Jörg LewaldFaculty of Psychology, Ruhr University Bochum, D-44780, Bochum, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9351-0170
Stephan GetzmannFaculty of Psychology, Ruhr University Bochum, D-44780, Bochum, Germany.
Jeffrey R MockDepartment of Psychology, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA, USA.

Funding

Shifting auditory spatial attention: cognitive and neural mechanismsR01DC014736 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO · PI GOLOB, EDWARD J · 2015 to 2019
$1.3M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC014736
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Speech recognition starts with representations of basic acoustic perceptual features and ends by categorizing the sound based on long-term memory for word meaning. However, little is known about whether the reverse pattern of lexical influences on basic perception can occur. We tested for a lexical influence on auditory spatial perception by having subjects make spatial judgments of number stimuli. Four experiments used pointing or left/right 2-alternative forced choice tasks to examine perceptual judgments of sound location as a function of digit magnitude (1-9). The main finding was that for stimuli presented near the median plane there was a linear left-to-right bias for localizing smaller-to-larger numbers. At lateral locations there was a central-eccentric location bias in the pointing task, and either a bias restricted to the smaller numbers (left side) or no significant number bias (right side). Prior number location also biased subsequent number judgments towards the opposite side. Findings support a lexical influence on auditory spatial perception, with a linear mapping near midline and more complex relations at lateral locations. Results may reflect coding of dedicated spatial channels, with two representing lateral positions in each hemispace, and the midline area represented by either their overlap or a separate third channel.

Indexed as

AdultFemaleHumansLanguageMaleSound LocalizationSpace PerceptionYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID29222526
PMCPMC5722947

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.