ArticleScientific reports2017
Improving Gene Regulatory Network Inference by Incorporating Rates of Transcriptional Changes.
Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- The biology of time: dynamic responses of cell types to developmental, circadian and environmental cues.The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology · 2022Review
- Unleashing the power within short-read RNA-seq for plant research: Beyond differential expression analysis and toward regulomics.Frontiers in plant science · 2022Review
- Time-Based Systems Biology Approaches to Capture and Model Dynamic Gene Regulatory Networks.Annual review of plant biology · 2021Review
- A comprehensive transcription factor and DNA-binding motif resource for the construction of gene regulatory networks inComputational and structural biotechnology journal · 2021Article
- Filtering of Data-Driven Gene Regulatory Networks UsingFrontiers in genetics · 2021Article
- Prediction of condition-specific regulatory genes using machine learning.Nucleic acids research · 2020Article
- An integrative approach for building personalized gene regulatory networks for precision medicine.Genome medicine · 2018Review
- Statistical and Machine Learning Approaches to Predict Gene Regulatory Networks From Transcriptome Datasets.Frontiers in plant science · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Organisms respond to changes in their environment through transcriptional regulatory networks (TRNs). The regulatory hierarchy of these networks can be inferred from expression data. Computational approaches to identify TRNs can be applied in any species where quality RNA can be acquired, However, ChIP-Seq and similar validation methods are challenging to employ in non-model species. Improving the accuracy of computational inference methods can significantly reduce the cost and time of subsequent validation experiments. We have developed ExRANGES, an approach that improves the ability to computationally infer TRN from time series expression data. ExRANGES utilizes both the rate of change in expression and the absolute expression level to identify TRN connections. We evaluated ExRANGES in five data sets from different model systems. ExRANGES improved the identification of experimentally validated transcription factor targets for all species tested, even in unevenly spaced and sparse data sets. This improved ability to predict known regulator-target relationships enhances the utility of network inference approaches in non-model species where experimental validation is challenging. We integrated ExRANGES with two different network construction approaches and it has been implemented as an R package available here: http://github.com/DohertyLab/ExRANGES . To install the package type: devtools::install_github("DohertyLab/ExRANGES").
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.