ArticleScientific reports2017
Exploring biased attention towards body-related stimuli and its relationship with body awareness.
Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Differential interference of body- and non-body-related representational conflicts on error and performance monitoring in flanker tasks.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- I am where I believe my body is: The interplay between body spatial prediction and body ownership.PloS one · 2024Article
- Humans, fish, spiders and bees inherited working memory and attention from their last common ancestor.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
- Interoceptive sensibility tunes risk-taking behaviour when body-related stimuli come into play.Scientific reports · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Stimuli of great social relevance exogenously capture attention. Here we explored the impact of body-related stimuli on endogenous attention. Additionally, we investigate the influence of internal states on biased attention towards this class of stimuli. Participants were presented with a body, face, or chair cue to hold in memory (Memory task) or to merely attend (Priming task) and, subsequently, they were asked to find a circle in an unrelated visual search task. In the valid condition, the circle was flanked by the cue. In the invalid condition, the pre-cued picture re-appeared flanking the distracter. In the neutral condition, the cue item did not re-appear in the search display. We found that although bodies and faces benefited from a general faster visual processing compared to chairs, holding them in memory did not produce any additional advantage on attention compared to when they are merely attended. Furthermore, face cues generated larger orienting effect compared to body and chairs cues in both Memory and Priming task. Importantly, results showed that individual sensitivity to internal bodily responses predicted the magnitude of the memory-based orienting of attention to bodies, shedding new light on the relationship between body awareness and visuo-spatial attention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.