Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29222080›Full record

ArticleJMIR mental health2017

The 12-item Self-Report World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS) 2.0 Administered Via the Internet to Individuals With Anxiety and Stress Disorders: A Psychometric Investigation Based on Data From Two Clinical Trials.

Erland Axelsson, Elin Lindsäter, Brjánn Ljótsson, Erik Andersson, Erik Hedman-Lagerlöf

3 registry-linked trialsAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR mental health, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 57 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02314065 nacompletednot on this map

Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Health Anxiety: a Randomized Controlled Non-inferiority Trial of Internet-delivered and Face-to-Face Therapy

TypeinterventionalSponsorKarolinska InstitutetRan2014 to 2018Enrolled204ConditionsSevere Health Anxiety, Somatic Symptom Disorder, Illness Anxiety DisorderArmsCBT, exposure and response prevention (Face-to-face), CBT, exposure and response prevention (Internet-based)
NCT02540317 nacompletednot on this map

Internet-based Cognitive Behavior Therapy for Stress Disorders: a Randomized Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorKarolinska InstitutetRan2015 to 2017Enrolled100ConditionsAdjustment Disorder, Burnout SyndromeArmsInternet-based CBT
NCT04317144 nasuspendednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Web-based Follow-up to Former ICU Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorUppsala UniversityRan2019 to 2027Enrolled330ConditionsPost Intensive Care Unit SyndromeArmsWeb-based follow-up programme., No follow-up
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trajectories of change in prolonged exposure for primary care: Who most likely benefits?Psychological trauma : theory, research, practice and policy · 2025
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Autonomic dysfunction and quality of life in a cohort of neurology outpatients with post-acute sequelae of COVID-19, a two-year follow-up study.Journal of clinical neuroscience : official journal of the Neurosurgical Society of Australasia · 2026
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Erland AxelssonDivision of Psychology, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2562-2925
Elin LindsäterDivision of Psychology, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2547-9196
Brjánn LjótssonDivision of Psychology, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8086-1668
Erik AnderssonDivision of Psychology, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0088-8719
Erik Hedman-LagerlöfDivision of Psychology, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7939-9848

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) is a widespread measure of disability and functional impairment, which is bundled with the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (Fifth Edition) for use in psychiatry. Administering psychometric scales via the Internet is an effective way to reach respondents and allow for convenient handling of data.

objectiveThe aim was to study the psychometric properties of the 12-item self-report WHODAS 2.0 when administered online to individuals with anxiety and stress disorders. The WHODAS 2.0 was hypothesized to exhibit high internal consistency and be unidimensional. We also expected the WHODAS 2.0 to show high 2-week test-retest reliability, convergent validity (correlations approximately .50 to .90 with other self-report measures of functional impairment), that it would differentiate between patients with and without exhaustion disorder, and that it would respond to change in primary symptom domain.

methodsWe administered the 12-item self-report WHODAS 2.0 online to patients with anxiety and stress disorders (N=160) enrolled in clinical trials of cognitive behavior therapy, and analyzed psychometric properties within a classical test theory framework. Scores were compared with well-established symptom and disability measures, and sensitivity to change was studied from pretreatment to posttreatment assessment.

resultsThe 12-item self-report WHODAS 2.0 showed high internal consistency (Cronbach alpha=.83-.92), high 2-week test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient=.83), adequate construct validity, and was sensitive to change. We found preliminary evidence for a three-factorial structure, but one strong factor accounted for a clear majority of the variance.

conclusionsWe conclude that the 12-item self-report WHODAS 2.0 is a psychometrically sound instrument when administered online to individuals with anxiety and stress disorders, but that it is probably fruitful to also report the three subfactors to facilitate comparisons between studies.

trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov NCT02540317; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02540317 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6vQEdYAem); Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02314065; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02314065 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6vQEjlUU8).

Indexed as

disabilityInternetpsychometricsquestionnairevalidityWHODAS

Identifiers

PMID29222080
PMCPMC5741825

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.