Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29222076›Full record

ArticleJMIR medical informatics2017

Adverse Drug Event Discovery Using Biomedical Literature: A Big Data Neural Network Adventure.

Ahmad P Tafti, Jonathan Badger, Eric LaRose, Ehsan Shirzadi, Andrea Mahnke, John Mayer, Zhan Ye, David Page, Peggy Peissig

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR medical informatics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Application of Improved LSTM Algorithm in Macroeconomic Forecasting.Computational intelligence and neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Exchange Rate Forecasting Based on Deep Learning and NSGA-II Models.Computational intelligence and neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Advertising Click-Through Rate Prediction Based on CNN-LSTM Neural Network.Computational intelligence and neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ahmad P TaftiBiomedical Informatics Research Center, Marshfield Clinic Research Institute, Marshfield, WI, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9650-2862
Jonathan BadgerBiomedical Informatics Research Center, Marshfield Clinic Research Institute, Marshfield, WI, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9924-2648
Eric LaRoseBiomedical Informatics Research Center, Marshfield Clinic Research Institute, Marshfield, WI, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4292-0086
Ehsan ShirzadiInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3470-1732
Andrea MahnkeBiomedical Informatics Research Center, Marshfield Clinic Research Institute, Marshfield, WI, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3611-6833
John MayerBiomedical Informatics Research Center, Marshfield Clinic Research Institute, Marshfield, WI, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6862-1052
Zhan YeBiomedical Informatics Research Center, Marshfield Clinic Research Institute, Marshfield, WI, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0426-0382
David PageDepartment of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0576-2912
Peggy PeissigBiomedical Informatics Research Center, Marshfield Clinic Research Institute, Marshfield, WI, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4156-0189

Funding

Institutional Clinical and Translational Science AwardUL1TR000427 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI DREZNER, MARC KENNETH · 2012 to 2016
$32.2M
TrainingU54AI117924 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI CRAVEN, MARK W. · 2014 to 2018
$11.3M
Machine Learning for Identifying Adverse Drug EventsR01GM097618 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI CALDWELL, MICHAEL DEFOIX, HANSEN, RICHARD A. · 2011 to 2018
$3.8M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000427NIAID NIH HHS U54 AI117924NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM097618
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe study of adverse drug events (ADEs) is a tenured topic in medical literature. In recent years, increasing numbers of scientific articles and health-related social media posts have been generated and shared daily, albeit with very limited use for ADE study and with little known about the content with respect to ADEs.

objectiveThe aim of this study was to develop a big data analytics strategy that mines the content of scientific articles and health-related Web-based social media to detect and identify ADEs.

methodsWe analyzed the following two data sources: (1) biomedical articles and (2) health-related social media blog posts. We developed an intelligent and scalable text mining solution on big data infrastructures composed of Apache Spark, natural language processing, and machine learning. This was combined with an Elasticsearch No-SQL distributed database to explore and visualize ADEs.

resultsThe accuracy, precision, recall, and area under receiver operating characteristic of the system were 92.7%, 93.6%, 93.0%, and 0.905, respectively, and showed better results in comparison with traditional approaches in the literature. This work not only detected and classified ADE sentences from big data biomedical literature but also scientifically visualized ADE interactions.

conclusionsTo the best of our knowledge, this work is the first to investigate a big data machine learning strategy for ADE discovery on massive datasets downloaded from PubMed Central and social media. This contribution illustrates possible capacities in big data biomedical text analysis using advanced computational methods with real-time update from new data published on a daily basis.

Indexed as

adverse drug eventadverse drug reactiondrug side effectsmachine learningtext mining

Identifiers

PMID29222076
PMCPMC5741828

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.