ArticleAtencion primaria2019
[The impact of patient identification on an integrated program of palliative care in Basque Country].
Article in Atencion primaria, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Economic burden of recurrence in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma after curative-intent treatment in Spain.Health economics review · 2026Article
- Educational community intervention with nonformal caregivers in a rural population to improve knowledge and resources related to palliative care: Study protocol.Palliative care and social practice · 2025Article
- Community-Based Interventions in People with Palliative Care Needs: An Integrative Review of Studies from 2017 to 2022.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Cost-effectiveness and epidemiological impact of gender-neutral HPV vaccination in Spain.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveEvaluate the process and the economic impact of an integrated palliative care program.
designComparative cross-sectional study. LOCATION: Integrated Healthcare Organizations of Alto Deba and Goierri Alto-Urola, Basque Country.
participantsPatients dead due to oncologic and non-oncologic causes in 2012 (control group) and 2015 (intervention group) liable to need palliative care according to McNamara criteria.
interventionsIdentification as palliative patients in primary care, use of common clinical pathways in primary and secondary care and arrange training courses for health professionals. MAIN MEASURES: Change in the resource use profile of patients in their last 3 months. Propensity score by genetic matching method was used to avoid non-randomization bias. The groups were compared by univariate analysis and the relationships between variables were analysed by logistic regressions and generalized linear models.
resultsOne thousand and twenty-three patients were identified in 2012 and 1,142 patients in 2015. In 2015 doubled the probability of being identify as palliative patient in deaths due to oncologic (19-33%) and non-oncologic causes (7-16%). Prescriptions of opiates rise (25-68%) and deaths in hospital remained stable. Contacts per patient with primary care and home hospitalization increased, while contacts with hospital admissions decreased. Cost per patient rise 26%.
conclusionsThe integrated palliative care model increased the identification of the target population. Relationships between variables showed that the identification had a positive impact on prescription of opiates, death outside the hospital and extension to non-oncologic diseases. Although the identification decreased admissions in hospital, costs per patient had a slight increase due to home hospitalizations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.