Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29221805›Full record

ArticleMolecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy2018

Skeletal Muscle Regenerative Potential of Human MuStem Cells following Transplantation into Injured Mice Muscle.

Judith Lorant, Charlotte Saury, Cindy Schleder, Florence Robriquet, Blandine Lieubeau, Elisa Négroni, Isabelle Leroux, Lucie Chabrand, Sabrina Viau, Candice Babarit and 11 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Cell Surface Proteins for Enrichment andStem cells international · 2022
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Stem Cell and Macrophage Roles in Skeletal Muscle Regenerative Medicine.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Current Strategies for the Regeneration of Skeletal Muscle Tissue.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Skeletal muscle cell transplantation: models and methods.Journal of muscle research and cell motility · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Cell therapy to improve regeneration of skeletal muscle injuries.Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle · 2019
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.

Judith LorantPAnTher, INRA, École Nationale Vétérinaire, Agro-alimentaire et de l'alimentation Nantes-Atlantique (Oniris), Université Bretagne Loire (UBL), Nantes 44307, France.
Charlotte SauryPAnTher, INRA, École Nationale Vétérinaire, Agro-alimentaire et de l'alimentation Nantes-Atlantique (Oniris), Université Bretagne Loire (UBL), Nantes 44307, France; Macopharma, Biotherapy Division, Mouvaux, 59420, France.
Cindy SchlederPAnTher, INRA, École Nationale Vétérinaire, Agro-alimentaire et de l'alimentation Nantes-Atlantique (Oniris), Université Bretagne Loire (UBL), Nantes 44307, France.
Florence RobriquetPAnTher, INRA, École Nationale Vétérinaire, Agro-alimentaire et de l'alimentation Nantes-Atlantique (Oniris), Université Bretagne Loire (UBL), Nantes 44307, France; Université de Nantes, UBL, Nantes, France.
Blandine LieubeauIECM, INRA, Oniris, Université de Nantes, UBL, Nantes 44307, France.
Elisa NégroniInstitut de Myologie, Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Université Paris 06, INSERM, CNRS, Paris 75013, France.
Isabelle LerouxPAnTher, INRA, École Nationale Vétérinaire, Agro-alimentaire et de l'alimentation Nantes-Atlantique (Oniris), Université Bretagne Loire (UBL), Nantes 44307, France.
Lucie ChabrandMacopharma, Biotherapy Division, Mouvaux, 59420, France.
Sabrina ViauMacopharma, Biotherapy Division, Mouvaux, 59420, France.
Candice BabaritPAnTher, INRA, École Nationale Vétérinaire, Agro-alimentaire et de l'alimentation Nantes-Atlantique (Oniris), Université Bretagne Loire (UBL), Nantes 44307, France.
Mireille LedevinPAnTher, INRA, École Nationale Vétérinaire, Agro-alimentaire et de l'alimentation Nantes-Atlantique (Oniris), Université Bretagne Loire (UBL), Nantes 44307, France.
Laurence DubreilPAnTher, INRA, École Nationale Vétérinaire, Agro-alimentaire et de l'alimentation Nantes-Atlantique (Oniris), Université Bretagne Loire (UBL), Nantes 44307, France.
Antoine HamelService de Chirurgie Infantile, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU), Nantes 44093, France.
Armelle MagotCentre de Référence des maladies neuromusculaires Nantes-Angers, Service des Explorations Fonctionnelles, CHU, Nantes 44093, France.
Chantal ThorinLaboratoire de Physiopathologie Animale et Pharmacologie fonctionnelle, Oniris, Nantes 44307, France.
Laëtitia GuevelPAnTher, INRA, École Nationale Vétérinaire, Agro-alimentaire et de l'alimentation Nantes-Atlantique (Oniris), Université Bretagne Loire (UBL), Nantes 44307, France; Université de Nantes, UBL, Nantes, France.
Bruno DelormeMacopharma, Biotherapy Division, Mouvaux, 59420, France.
Yann PéréonCentre de Référence des maladies neuromusculaires Nantes-Angers, Service des Explorations Fonctionnelles, CHU, Nantes 44093, France.
Gillian Butler-BrowneInstitut de Myologie, Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Université Paris 06, INSERM, CNRS, Paris 75013, France.
Vincent MoulyInstitut de Myologie, Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Université Paris 06, INSERM, CNRS, Paris 75013, France.
Karl RougerPAnTher, INRA, École Nationale Vétérinaire, Agro-alimentaire et de l'alimentation Nantes-Atlantique (Oniris), Université Bretagne Loire (UBL), Nantes 44307, France. Electronic address: karl.rouger@inra.fr.
Oniris · FRMacopharma (France) · FRUniversité Bretagne Loire · FRInstitut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nantes · FRInserm · FRInstitut de Myologie · FRNantes Université · FRSorbonne Université · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

After intra-arterial delivery in the dystrophic dog, allogeneic muscle-derived stem cells, termed MuStem cells, contribute to long-term stabilization of the clinical status and preservation of the muscle regenerative process. However, it remains unknown whether the human counterpart could be identified, considering recent demonstrations of divergent features between species for several somatic stem cells. Here, we report that MuStem cells reside in human skeletal muscle and display a long-term ability to proliferate, allowing generation of a clinically relevant amount of cells. Cultured human MuStem (hMuStem) cells do not express hematopoietic, endothelial, or myo-endothelial cell markers and reproducibly correspond to a population of early myogenic-committed progenitors with a perivascular/mesenchymal phenotypic signature, revealing a blood vessel wall origin. Importantly, they exhibit both myogenesis in vitro and skeletal muscle regeneration after intramuscular delivery into immunodeficient host mice. Together, our findings provide new insights supporting the notion that hMuStem cells could represent an interesting therapeutic candidate for dystrophic patients.

Indexed as

RegenerationStem Cell TransplantationAdult Stem CellsAnimalsCell DifferentiationCell ProliferationCells, CulturedHumansMiceMuscle DevelopmentMuscle, SkeletalMuscular Dystrophy, AnimalMuscular Dystrophy, DuchenneMyoblasts, SkeletalRegenerative Medicinecell therapyDMDhuman adult stem cellsMuStemregenerative medicineskeletal muscle

Identifiers

PMID29221805
PMCPMC5835152
OpenAlexW2765110201

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.