Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29221448›Full record

ReviewJournal of translational medicine2017

Next-generation sequencing: recent applications to the analysis of colorectal cancer.

Filippo Del Vecchio, Valentina Mastroiaco, Antinisca Di Marco, Chiara Compagnoni, Daria Capece, Francesca Zazzeroni, Carlo Capalbo, Edoardo Alesse, Alessandra Tessitore

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of translational medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Recent Insights into Nanotechnology in Colorectal Cancer.Applied biochemistry and biotechnology · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. PARP Inhibitors in Colorectal Malignancies: A 2023 Update.Reviews on recent clinical trials · 2024
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Filippo Del VecchioDivision of Cancer Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, Hampshire, SO16 6YD, UK.
Valentina MastroiacoDepartment of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, 67100, Italy.
Antinisca Di MarcoDepartment of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, 67100, Italy.
Chiara CompagnoniDepartment of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, 67100, Italy.
Daria CapeceDepartment of Medicine, Centre for Cell Signaling and Inflammation, Imperial College London, London, W12 0NN, UK.
Francesca ZazzeroniDepartment of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, 67100, Italy.
Carlo CapalboDepartment of Molecular Medicine, La Sapienza University, Rome, 00161, Italy.
Edoardo AlesseDepartment of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, 67100, Italy.
Alessandra TessitoreDepartment of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, 67100, Italy. alessandra.tessitore@univaq.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7663-2210

Funding

MIUR-FIRB RBAP10A9H9
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since the establishment of the Sanger sequencing method, scientists around the world focused their efforts to progress in the field to produce the utmost technology. The introduction of next-generation sequencing (NGS) represents a revolutionary step and promises to lead to massive improvements in our understanding on the role of nucleic acids functions. Cancer research began to use this innovative and highly performing method, and interesting results started to appear in colorectal cancer (CRC) analysis. Several studies produced high-quality data in terms of mutation discovery, especially about actionable or less frequently mutated genes, epigenetics, transcriptomics. Analysis of results is unveiling relevant perspectives aiding to evaluate the response to therapies. Novel evidences have been presented also in other directions such as gut microbiota or CRC circulating tumor cells. However, despite its unquestioned potential, NGS poses some issues calling for additional studies. This review intends to offer a view of the state of the art of NGS applications to CRC through examination of the most important technologies and discussion of recent published results.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsEpigenesis, GeneticGene Expression ProfilingHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansMutationColorectal cancerNext-generation sequencingPrecision medicineTargeted therapy

Identifiers

PMID29221448
PMCPMC5723063

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.