ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2017
Five reasons for caution in advocating low-dose computerized tomographic lung cancer screening.
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Blood based biomarkers beyond genomics for lung cancer screening.Translational lung cancer research · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The 53.5K-person, low-dose computerized tomographic (LDCT), National Lung Cancer Screening Trial (NLST) achieved a 20% reduction in lung cancer mortality and a 6.7% reduction in all-cause mortality at 6.5-year median follow-up. Failure of European LDCT trials employing null (i.e., unscreened) controls to reproduce this benefit compels caution in adopting a policy of population screening. Additional concerns merit attention: surgical mortality is not trivial; overdiagnosis is substantial; disease-free life expectancy and quality of life are markedly diminished by loss of pulmonary reserve; the combination of overdiagnosis and diminished disease-free life expectancy is pernicious.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.